Helmet Shroud Assembly Interference Fit Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing helmet shroud assemblies experience clearance and play issues due to manufacturing tolerances and wear from repeated attachment and removal of night vision devices, leading to reduced stability and increased weight on the user.

Innovation Solution

A shroud assembly with a polymer frame and metal insert, featuring spaced walls for an interference fit and a friction pad for enhanced stability, which reduces relative movement and weight by providing a snug fit with the helmet and mounting assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If standard hole patterns and shrouds are used for mounting, then adaptability and ease of manufacture are improved, but manufacturing tolerances result in clearance and play between components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with standardized hole patternsVSAvoidclearance between receptacle and mounting system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shroud is divided into two separate components: a frame and an insert. The insert is separately formed and removably attached to the frame, allowing each component to be manufactured with optimized tolerances. This segmentation eliminates the clearance issues that arise when a single shroud must accommodate both mounting holes and mounting interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insert acts as an intermediary component between the frame and the mounting system. It provides a precise interfacing portion that mates with the mounting assembly, while the frame provides the mounting structure. This intermediary element isolates the mounting interface from the manufacturing tolerances of the frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If repeated removal and attachment of mounting assemblies is allowed, then adaptability and ease of operation are improved, but wear increases resulting in greater clearance and play

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremovable attachment capabilityVSAvoidstability after repeated use
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the shroud into frame and insert components, the insert can be designed with wear-resistant features specifically at the mounting interface. The insert can be replaced independently if worn, without replacing the entire shroud assembly, thus maintaining reliability over time while preserving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shroud uses a composite construction with a frame made of one material and an insert made of another material optimized for the mounting interface. This allows the insert to be made from materials with superior wear resistance properties, maintaining stability even after repeated attachment and removal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If metal shrouds are used, then strength and reliability are improved, but weight increases causing strain on user's neck

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strength of shroudVSAvoidweight of shroud assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The shroud employs composite construction where the frame can be made from lightweight materials such as polymer composites or aluminum alloys, while the insert uses metal or wear-resistant material only where structurally necessary at the mounting interface. This reduces overall weight while maintaining the strength required for reliable mounting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Manufacturing precision

If tighter manufacturing tolerances are applied, then manufacturing precision is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit between shroud and mounting assemblyVSAvoidcomplexity of manufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Segmenting the shroud into frame and insert allows different manufacturing approaches for each component. The frame can be manufactured with standard tolerances using simpler processes, while the insert is manufactured separately with tighter tolerances only where needed at the mounting interface. This reduces overall manufacturing complexity while achieving the required precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution prevents movement between the mounting assembly and shroud, reduces weight, and strengthens the connection, enhancing user comfort and reducing wear on the neck.

Implementation Method 1

the first and second walls spaced a sufficient distance apart to provide an interference fit between the mounting assembly and the first and second spaced apart walls

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference fit: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a friction pad for enhanced stability, which reduces relative movement and weight by providing a snug fit with the helmet and mounting assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12059048B2Headgear shroud assembly
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 WILCOX IND CORP CORP
  • US12059048B2 patent drawing
  • US12059048B2 patent drawing
  • US12059048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shroud assembly for headgear includes a frame having a first side configured to face toward an exterior surface of the headgear and a second side opposite the first side and configured to face away from the headgear, the first side having a shape that matches a contour of the headgear. An insert separately formed from the frame is removably attached to the first side of the frame, the insert configured for removable attachment to a mounting assembly. The frame includes first and second spaced apart walls disposed on the front side of the frame on opposite sides of the insert, the first and second walls spaced a sufficient distance apart to provide an interference fit between the mounting assembly and the first and second spaced apart walls.