Gas Turbine Shroud Rib Stiffening for CMC Rigidity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shroud assemblies in gas turbine engines, particularly those made from ceramic matrix composite materials, face issues with structural rigidity due to uneven loading and pressure differentials, leading to potential damage at flange-body intersections.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of 'open'-style shroud designs with integral ribs that provide stiffening effects, reducing stresses and damage by stabilizing the shroud structure, especially when formed from ceramic matrix composite materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If open-style shroud designs are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but structural rigidity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstructural rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The shroud is segmented into multiple modular components including the shroud body, forward flange, rear flange, and multiple ribs. These segments can be manufactured separately and then assembled together, maintaining the manufacturing advantages of open-style designs while allowing for optimized structural features like ribs that enhance rigidity without requiring the entire shroud to be manufactured as a single complex piece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Ribs are added as a third dimensional feature extending from the shroud body between the flanges. This adds structural stiffness in the radial dimension without complicating the basic open-style configuration. The ribs create a three-dimensional framework that resists deformation from pressure differentials while maintaining the fundamental two-flange open structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If open-style shroud designs are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the shroud into manageable components (body, flanges, ribs), each can be manufactured and quality-checked separately, ensuring high reliability of individual parts. The modular assembly allows for precise fitting and bonding of each segment, reducing the risk of failures at critical interfaces while preserving manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The addition of ribs creates a three-dimensional structural framework that distributes and reinforces load paths throughout the shroud. This enhanced structural geometry provides multiple load-bearing pathways, increasing redundancy and reliability while maintaining the simple open-style configuration with forward and rear flanges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If ribs are added to the shroud, then structural rigidity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ribs are merged with the shroud body and flanges to form an integral structure. Rather than being separate attachments, the ribs are formed as continuous structural elements that are bonded or integrated with the shroud body and flanges, creating a unified component that reduces assembly complexity while providing enhanced rigidity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ribs serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide structural rigidity, distribute pressure loads, and can be designed to match the aesthetic or functional requirements of the shroud. This multi-functionality means that adding ribs does not merely increase complexity for the sake of rigidity, but provides several benefits from a single structural feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3081759B1Shroud assembly and shroud for gas turbine engine
Publication Date: 2021.06.23 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3081759B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3081759B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3081759B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Shroud assemblies (100) and shrouds (102) for gas turbine engines (16) are provided. A shroud (102) includes a shroud body (110) which includes a forward surface (112), a rear surface (114) axially spaced from the forward surface (112), an inner surface (116) extending between the forward surface (112) and the rear surface (114), and an outer surface (118) extending between the forward surface (112) and the rear surface (114) and radially spaced from the inner surface (116). The shroud (102) further includes a forward flange (120) extending from the outer surface (118)of the shroud body (110), and a rear flange (130) extending from the outer surface (118)of the shroud body (110), the rear flange (130) axially spaced from the forward flange (120). The shroud (102) further includes a rib (140) disposed between and in contact with the forward flange (120) and the rear flange (130). Shroud assemblies and shrouds for gas turbine engines are provided. A shroud includes a shroud body which includes a forward surface, a rear surface axially spaced from the forward surface, an inner surface extending between the forward surface and the rear surface, and an outer surface extending between the forward surface and the rear surface and radially spaced from the inner surface. The shroud further includes a forward flange extending from the outer surface of the shroud body, and a rear flange extending from the outer surface of the shroud body, the rear flange axially spaced from the forward flange. The shroud further includes a rib disposed between and in contact with the forward flange and the rear flange.