Dynamic Shuttle Sortation With Flexible Bin Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sortation systems are inefficient and inflexible, requiring large numbers of collection bins, high capital and operating costs, and relying heavily on human labor, with limited throughput and divert capabilities.

Innovation Solution

An automated shuttle sorter system with a movable carriage that can dynamically assign objects to multiple destination locations, using robotic manipulators and learning algorithms to optimize sorting and reduce the need for manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of collection bins are used to handle diverse objects, then the system can accommodate more diverts and object types, but the physical space, capital costs, and operating costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of divertsVSAvoidphysical space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically assigns objects to collection bins based on real-time conditions rather than using fixed, dedicated bins for each object type. The bin assignment is flexible and can change depending on current workload, object characteristics, and system state, allowing the same bin to serve multiple object types at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Collection bins are designed to be multi-functional, handling multiple types of objects rather than being dedicated to a single object type. This universal approach allows fewer bins to serve more diverse object streams by dynamically routing different object types to the same bin based on current needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If human workers perform sortation manually, then the system is flexible in handling various objects, but the throughput is limited by worker speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual human sorting with an automated control system that uses sensors, algorithms, and automated mechanisms to identify objects and direct them to appropriate bins. This substitution maintains flexibility in handling diverse objects while dramatically increasing throughput beyond human capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The sortation system is self-regulating through automated decision-making algorithms that determine optimal bin assignments without human intervention. The system automatically adjusts to different object types and routing requirements, maintaining adaptability while operating at automated speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If recirculating conveyors with tilt trays are used for automated sortation, then throughput increases, but the system complexity and capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex tilt tray mechanism from the sortation system and replaces it with simpler automated divert mechanisms. The core sortation logic and object handling remain, but the mechanical complexity of tilting trays is removed, reducing system complexity while maintaining throughput capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an automated control system as an intermediary between object identification and physical sortation. This software-based mediator handles the complexity of decision-making and bin assignment, allowing simpler physical sortation mechanisms to achieve the same throughput that would otherwise require complex mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If bins are arranged within efficient reach of human workers, then ease of operation is maintained, but the number of diverts is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker accessibilityVSAvoidnumber of diverts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a two-dimensional workspace arrangement (bins within arm's reach on a conveyor) to a three-dimensional automated storage and retrieval system. Bins can be positioned in locations that would be inaccessible to human workers, and automated mechanisms handle the retrieval and sortation, expanding the number of diverts beyond what is physically accessible to humans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250281943A1Systems and methods for dynamic sortation of objects
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • US20250281943A1 patent drawing
  • US20250281943A1 patent drawing
  • US20250281943A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated shuttle sorter is disclosed that includes a carriage that is movable from a load position at which the carriage may be loaded, and at least two destination locations into which any contents of the carriage may be provided from the carriage.