Sacroiliac Fusion Implant With Deployable Wings for Joint Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion devices fail to provide adequate compression across the joint, leading to difficulty in fusion due to significant micromotions, and lack moving mechanical components that are actuated once implanted.

Innovation Solution

An implant with a distal anchor featuring deployable wings and a threaded proximal end, allowing for adjustable compression across the SI joint through a plunger mechanism, and a compressive element to anchor against the ilium, facilitating fusion and stabilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If typical SI joint fusion devices are used, then the implant can be inserted over a guidewire, but the device fails to provide adequate compression across the SI joint to enhance fusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression forceVSAvoidfusion reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The implant incorporates a dynamic compression mechanism where a compressive element can be adjusted along the implant body to provide variable compression forces. This allows the device to adapt to different patient anatomies and provide adequate compression for fusion while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The implant allows changes in the compression parameter through adjustable positioning of the compressive element. By modifying the compression force parameter, the device can achieve adequate compression across the SI joint to enhance fusion while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If typical SI joint fusion devices are used, then the implant structure is simple, but the device lacks moving mechanical components that are actuated once implanted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepost-implantation actuationVSAvoidmechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant includes a dynamic compression mechanism with a compressive element that can be adjusted along the implant body. This moving mechanical component can be actuated after implantation to provide compression, enhancing fusion while maintaining reasonable device complexity through a straightforward adjustment mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If the SI joint is not compressed adequately, then micromotions occur that prevent fusion, but applying compression requires complex mechanical structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint stabilityVSAvoidcompression mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant incorporates a dynamic compression mechanism where a compressive element can be adjusted along the implant body to provide variable compression forces. This allows the device to stabilize the joint by reducing micromotions while maintaining reasonable complexity through a straightforward adjustment mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The implant allows changes in the compression parameter through adjustable positioning of the compressive element. By modifying the compression force parameter, the device can achieve adequate compression to stabilize the joint and reduce micromotions without requiring overly complex mechanical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The implant provides adjustable compression, reducing micromotions and enhancing fusion and stabilization of the SI joint, with minimally invasive insertion and quicker recovery times.

Implementation Method 1

a threaded proximal end along the length of the first body; and a second body coupled to the threaded proximal end, the second body including a proximal anchor disposed on an outer surface of the second body, wherein the second body is configured to be threaded along the threaded proximal end to adjust an overall length of the implant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreading: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS12478478B2Sacroiliac joint fusion implants, insertion instruments, and methods
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 SPINAL SIMPLICITY LLC
  • US12478478B2 patent drawing
  • US12478478B2 patent drawing
  • US12478478B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and devices for sacroiliac joint fusion described include an implant comprising a first body having a distal anchor and a second body having proximal anchor. The first body includes a threaded body integrally formed with the first body or threadably coupled to the first body. The distal anchor may be formed by a pair of deployable wings. The pair of deployable wings may be deployed within the cancellous bone of the sacrum and anchored against the cortical bone of the sacrum. The proximal anchor may engage with an outer surface of the ilium. The second body may be threaded along the threaded body to provide compression across the sacroiliac joint. Compressing the sacroiliac joint can reduce motion thereof to promote fusion and stabilization.