Siamese Tracking With Structured Dropout for Occlusion Robustness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional object trackers face challenges such as appearance variations, occlusion, clutter, and sampling drift, which affect their ability to accurately track objects.

Innovation Solution

The method involves modifying latent space features of a target image using structured dropout techniques, such as channel, segment, and slice dropouts, to mimic occlusion and appearance variations, and aggregating multiple predictions to improve tracking robustness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional object trackers are used, then the tracking process is simple, but the tracker fails to handle occlusion and appearance variations effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking robustnessVSAvoidtracking process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing structured dropout modifications on the target image features before the tracking prediction process. Multiple dropout variants (channel, segment, slice) are pre-generated to simulate occlusion and appearance variations, allowing the tracker to learn robust features in advance rather than reacting to occlusion during tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the feature processing into multiple dropout variants (channel dropout, segment dropout, slice dropout), where each variant processes different portions or aspects of the target image features. This segmentation allows the system to handle different types of occlusion and appearance variations through specialized processing paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If multiple dropout variants are used to handle occlusion, then tracking accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple dropout variant predictions through aggregation (e.g., averaging or voting) to produce the final tracking result. This combining approach consolidates the computational effort of multiple dropout variants into a single unified prediction, reducing the overall computational burden while maintaining the accuracy benefits of handling multiple occlusion scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If structured dropout is applied to target image features, then the tracker becomes more robust to appearance variations, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness to appearance variationsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively applying different dropout variants based on the specific tracking scenario and occlusion conditions. Rather than always applying all dropout variants, the system can adjust the level of dropout application, using fewer variants when occlusion is minimal and more variants when occlusion is severe, thus optimizing processing time while maintaining robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12380689B2Managing occlusion in Siamese tracking using structured dropouts
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12380689B2 patent drawing
  • US12380689B2 patent drawing
  • US12380689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for object tracking includes receiving a target image of an object of interest. Latent space features of the target image is modified at a forward pass for a neural network by dropping at least one channel of the latent space features, dropping a channel corresponding to a slice of the latent space features, or dropping one or more features of the latent space features. At the forward pass, a location of the object of interest in a search image is predicted based on the modified latent space features. The location of the object of interest is identified by aggregating predicted locations from the forward pass.