Sibling Cache Pre-fetching for Multi-Core Pipeline Contention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pre-fetching techniques face limitations, particularly in multi-core processor architectures where shared caches can lead to pipeline resource contention and reduced performance due to the need for threads to share the same cache, which is not always efficient and can result in cache misses.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a 'sibling pre-fetch' mechanism where a processor core associated with one cache can pre-fetch data into a distinct cache in another processor core, allowing a first thread to pre-fetch data for a second thread without requiring a shared L1 cache, using a sibling pre-fetch instruction that directs load fills to both caches, even if the memory address is not available in the second cache.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If two threads share a common L1 cache for pre-fetching, then pre-fetching capability is improved, but pipeline resource contention increases and performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-fetching capabilityVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cache system into separate L1 caches for each processor core, with each core having its own dedicated cache. This segmentation allows thread A to execute on core 0 with its own L1 cache while thread B executes on core 1 with its own L1 cache, eliminating pipeline resource contention while maintaining pre-fetching capability through inter-core communication via the shared L2 cache.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the L2 cache as an intermediary between separate L1 caches of different cores. Thread A can issue pre-fetch requests that are routed through core A's L1 cache to the shared L2 cache, which then fills the data into both core A's L1 cache and core B's L1 cache, enabling pre-fetching without requiring direct L1 cache sharing and avoiding pipeline contention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If threads share a common cache, then pre-fetching is enabled, but cache misses increase due to contention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-fetchingVSAvoidcache hit rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By providing dedicated L1 caches for each core, the patent ensures that each thread has exclusive access to its own cache, eliminating contention-related misses. The segmentation allows thread A and thread B to independently manage their own L1 caches while still benefiting from pre-fetching through the coordinated action enabled by shared L2 cache access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If separate caches are used for each core, then pipeline resource contention is avoided, but pre-fetching between cores becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipeline throughputVSAvoidpre-fetch mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the L2 cache serve multiple functions: it acts as both a standard cache for storing data and as a communication medium for coordinating pre-fetch operations between cores. This multi-functionality simplifies the pre-fetch mechanism by using existing cache infrastructure rather than requiring complex dedicated pre-fetch hardware, allowing thread A to pre-fetch data into thread B's L1 cache through standard L2 cache access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8341357B2Pre-fetching for a sibling cache
Publication Date: 2012.12.25 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US8341357B2 patent drawing
  • US8341357B2 patent drawing
  • US8341357B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment provides a system that pre-fetches into a sibling cache. During operation, a first thread executes in a first processor core associated with a first cache, while a second thread associated with the first thread simultaneously executes in a second processor core associated with a second cache. During execution, the second thread encounters an instruction that triggers a request to a lower-level cache which is shared by the first cache and the second cache. The system responds to this request by directing a load fill which returns from the lower-level cache in response to the request to the first cache, thereby reducing cache misses for the first thread.