Reaction-Bonded SiC/B4C Composite for Ballistic Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current reaction-bonded boron carbide (B4C) and silicon carbide (SiC) materials perform poorly against tungsten carbide ammunition due to high hardness and velocity, leading to amorphization and reduced ballistic performance, and high costs of lightweight protection solutions.

Innovation Solution

A composite body made of reaction-bonded SiC/B4C with coarse-grained B4C (>100 μm) and fine-grained SiC, infiltrated with molten silicon, optimized by controlling carbon content and microstructure to prevent amorphization and enhance bonding, using 3D powder bed printing for large-scale production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If reaction-bonded B4C or SiC materials are used for ballistic protection, then weight is reduced compared to steel, but performance against tungsten carbide ammunition deteriorates due to amorphization at high velocities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective material weightVSAvoidballistic performance against WC ammunition
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite material system combining B4C, SiC, and metallic binder phases. This composite structure allows the material to leverage the high hardness of B4C while the SiC and metallic binder prevent amorphization during high-velocity impact, resolving the contradiction between lightweight protection and ballistic reliability against tungsten carbide ammunition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the microstructural parameters by controlling grain size distribution (d10, d50, d90 values), B4C content (30-70 wt%), and binder phase composition. These parameter adjustments optimize the material's resistance to amorphization while maintaining lightweight characteristics, enabling effective protection against WC ammunition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Weight of moving object

If sintered B4C is used to reduce weight, then ballistic performance improves, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective material weightVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes processing parameters including sintering temperature (1800-2200°C), holding time, and atmospheric composition to achieve dense microstructures with controlled grain growth. These parameter optimizations enable cost-effective production of lightweight protective materials with sintered B4C characteristics without requiring expensive proprietary processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates local variations in microstructure through controlled grain size distribution and phase distribution. The metallic binder phases are strategically distributed to prevent amorphization at critical stress zones, while maintaining overall material density and cost-effectiveness comparable to reaction-bonded materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If fine grain size materials are used, then ballistic performance improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballistic performanceVSAvoidmicrostructure control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the microstructure into distinct grain size populations (fine grains for strength, coarse grains for toughness) and phase distributions (B4C, SiC, metallic binder). This segmentation allows each phase to perform its optimal function while simplifying the overall manufacturing process through standardized powder mixing and sintering procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite body achieves improved ballistic performance and cost-effectiveness by stabilizing B4C within a SiC matrix, allowing effective protection against tungsten carbide ammunition and offering weight savings through efficient, large-scale, homogeneous material production.

Implementation Method 1

a reaction-bonded, silicon-infiltrated mixed ceramic material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSilicon infiltration and reaction bonding: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

infiltrated with molten silicon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

the formation of secondary silicon carbide. The type and quantity of any added carbon are decisive for the formation of secondary silicon carbide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 4

primary grains of crystalline B4C grains of average grain size d50>100 μm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Data Source

PatentUS20240158311A1Composite body made from a reaction-bonded mixed ceramic infiltrated with molten silicon
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 SCHUNK INGENIEURKERAMIK GMBH
  • US20240158311A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A shaped composite body of a reaction-bonded, silicon-infiltrated mixed ceramic, the microstructure of which is determined by primary grains of crystalline B4C grains (1) of mean grain size d50>100 μm and <500 μm and a fraction of >10%, by weight, and <50%, by weight, and by primary grains of a finer silicon carbide with d50<70 μm and a fraction of >10%, by weight, and <50%, by weight, and the primary grains are siliconized (3) bonded by secondarily formed silicon carbide with a fraction of >5%, by weight and <25%, by weight, in a silicon carbide matrix having a free metallic silicon (2) content of >1%, by weight, and <20%, by weight.