Silicon Carbide Epitaxial Substrate Exfoliation for Lower Defect Cost

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost of wide bandgap semiconductor devices is predominantly due to the expensive substrate materials, particularly silicon carbide substrates, which have not seen a reduction in cost despite improved quality, and defects in these substrates lead to yield loss and potential reliability issues in high-current devices.

Innovation Solution

The method involves creating an array of micro-voids in the silicon carbide substrate, filling these voids with a carbonized polymer layer, and then growing an epitaxial layer using merged epitaxial lateral overgrowth (MELO) to form a Schottky Barrier Diode, allowing for the exfoliation of the device from the substrate, thereby reducing substrate costs and maintaining low defect densities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional substrate fabrication processes are used, then substrate quality is maintained, but substrate cost remains high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate qualityVSAvoidsubstrate cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the expensive silicon carbide substrate after the epitaxial layer has been grown. The substrate is no longer needed once it has served its purpose as a growth platform, allowing cost reduction while maintaining device quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate is discarded after use in the epitaxial growth process. The expensive substrate material is consumed only for the purpose of growing the active layer, and then removed, converting a recurring cost into a one-time consumable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Power

If larger die sizes are used for high current devices, then device capability is improved, but defect impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice current capabilityVSAvoidyield and reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the substrate after growth, the patent eliminates the source of substrate-related defects from the final device structure. This extraction of the substrate prevents defect propagation to larger die areas, enabling high-current applications without proportional yield loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the fabrication process into substrate preparation, epitaxial growth, and substrate removal phases. This segmentation allows the substrate to be optimized for growth purposes while the final device structure is optimized for performance, decoupling substrate quality constraints from device performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If substrate fabrication complexity is reduced, then manufacturing cost decreases, but substrate quality may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidsubstrate quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs the substrate as a disposable, low-cost consumable item for the epitaxial growth process. Rather than investing in expensive, high-quality substrates that must be reused or carefully managed, a simpler, cheaper substrate is used once and then discarded, eliminating the need for complex quality maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate is prepared and processed beforehand specifically for the epitaxial growth function. Any necessary quality attributes are established during substrate fabrication before it reaches the epitaxial reactor, allowing simple substrates to be adequately prepared for their specific purpose without requiring inherently complex substrate materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the substrate contribution to the final device cost, enhances yield by minimizing defect impact, and maintains performance parameters, enabling the production of cost-effective wide bandgap semiconductor devices with improved reliability.

Implementation Method 1

the polymer layer is pyrolyzed to form a carbonized polymer layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

growing an epitaxial layer using merged epitaxial lateral overgrowth (MELO)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEpitaxy: Epitaxy

Data Source

PatentUS12322657B2Wide band gap semiconductor process, device, and method
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 THINSIC INC
  • US12322657B2 patent drawing
  • US12322657B2 patent drawing
  • US12322657B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor substrate comprising a first epitaxial silicon carbide layer and a second silicon carbide epitaxial layer. At least one semiconductor device is formed in or on the second silicon carbide epitaxial layer. The semiconductor substrate is formed overlying a silicon carbide substrate having a surface comprising silicon carbide and carbon. An exfoliation process is used to remove the semiconductor substrate from the silicon carbide substrate. The carbon on the surface of the silicon carbide substrate supports separation. A portion of the silicon carbide substrate on the semiconductor substrate is removed after the exfoliation process. The surface of the silicon carbide substrate is prepared for reuse in subsequent formation of semiconductor substrates.