Side Door Reinforcement and Foam Damping for Side-Impact Intrusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing side doors in motor vehicles face challenges in absorbing energy during side impacts, leading to increased intrusions and potential overload of joint connections, and require costly, model-specific adaptations for different crash requirements.

Innovation Solution

A side door design featuring a reinforcement element with two deformation regions and an impact damper, where the upper deformation region overlaps the barrier's smaller portion and the lower region overlaps the side sill, supported by a foam part to prevent the door from being pulled over the sill during a collision, using cost-effective materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a reinforcement element is used to support the side door on the side sill, then the side door stability is improved, but the side door can still be pulled over the side sill in severe side impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside door stabilityVSAvoidprotection against side impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement element is divided into multiple segments or zones with different deformation characteristics. The lower portion engages with the side sill to prevent door displacement, while the upper portion provides energy absorption through controlled deformation, creating a segmented defense mechanism against side impacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement element's geometric parameters are optimized to change during impact - the deformation regions are designed to progressively collapse or deform under load, transforming the rigid support structure into a energy-absorbing mechanism that maintains door stability while preventing over-pulling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If an extruded profile reinforcement element is used, then the side impact protection is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases and model-specific adaptations are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside impact protectionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement element is designed with universal geometric features and standardized connection interfaces that can be applied across different vehicle models. The deformation regions are configured to work effectively with various side sill designs, eliminating the need for model-specific customization while maintaining protection performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement element uses cost-effective materials and simple geometric forms that can be manufactured through conventional processes. The design accepts controlled deformation during impact, using inexpensive materials strategically positioned to provide maximum protection at minimum cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Loss of energy

If deformation regions are added to the reinforcement element, then the energy absorption capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorptionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deformation regions incorporate curved or rounded geometric features that naturally promote controlled collapse during impact. These curved profiles guide the deformation progression without requiring complex internal structures, achieving energy absorption through simple geometric design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement element uses thin-walled structural sections that are designed to buckle or deform in a controlled manner during impact. These flexible thin-walled structures absorb energy through progressive collapse while maintaining simplicity in overall design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively absorbs energy and prevents the side door from being pulled over the side sill, maintaining structural integrity while being cost-effective and adaptable to various crash requirements.

Implementation Method 1

an impact damper formed as a foam part is provided inside the side door between the reinforcement element and the side sill

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact damping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS12377718B2Motor vehicle having a side door
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 MERCEDES BENZ GROUP AG
  • US12377718B2 patent drawing
  • US12377718B2 patent drawing
  • US12377718B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor vehicle includes a body that has a doorway. A side door is moveably held on the doorway and displaceable between a closed position and an open position. The side door has an inner door part, a reinforcement element, and a planking element. The reinforcement element has an upper deformation region and a lower deformation region. An impact damper that is a foam part is disposed inside the side door between the reinforcement element and the inner door part. The impact damper extends over at least a partial length of the reinforcement element and substantially completely fills a cavity delimited between the reinforcement element and the inner door part.