Vehicle Side Panel Laser Cutting with Parallel Robot Stations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laser cutting systems for vehicle structural components are inefficient, requiring long cutting times and increased logistics and personnel, which reduces productivity and necessitates larger manufacturing spaces due to the need for multiple laser cells and longer robot arms to handle large components.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing multiple laser cutting stations with multi-axis robots, where components are processed in parallel, reducing cutting time and area requirements by allowing simultaneous cutting operations across multiple laser heads and robots, and incorporating trepanning tools for precise aperture finishing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single laser cutting system is used for large structural components, then the equipment investment is lower, but the cutting time is long and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speedVSAvoidnumber of laser stations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cutting process into multiple independent laser stations (first laser station, second laser station, etc.), each equipped with laser cutting heads that operate simultaneously on different sections of the component. This segmentation allows parallel processing, significantly reducing total cutting time while maintaining manageable equipment complexity at each station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential single-point cutting to multi-point parallel cutting by distributing laser heads across multiple stations arranged in space. This spatial dimensionality change enables simultaneous cutting operations on different areas of the large structural component, effectively increasing productivity without requiring a single overly complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If multiple laser cells are used to increase productivity, then cutting time is reduced, but the manufacturing space and logistics requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple laser cutting stations into an integrated manufacturing system that processes large structural components in a coordinated manner. By merging the functions of multiple laser cells into a unified workflow with synchronized operations, the system achieves high productivity while optimizing space utilization through shared fixtures, coordinated robot arms, and streamlined material flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If longer robot arms are used to handle large components, then the coverage area is increased, but the system occupies more manufacturing space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidrobot arm length
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cutting tasks across multiple laser stations, allowing each robot arm to operate within a compact, localized workspace. Instead of requiring one extremely long robot arm to cover the entire component, multiple shorter robot arms at different stations each handle specific sections, reducing the length requirement for individual robot arms while maintaining overall system coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases productivity, reduces manufacturing costs, and synchronizes hot forming and cutting processes, allowing for efficient production of large structural components like unitary side panels with improved precision and reduced space requirements.

Implementation Method 1

cutting a first plurality of areas of the component with the plurality of laser cutting heads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

After heating, the blank is hot formed, and may then subsequently be quenched. This process is known as press-hardening. With such a process, a predominantly martensite microstructure may be created.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

Hot Forming Die Quenching (HFDQ) uses boron steel sheets to create stamped components with Ultra High Strength Steel (UHSS) properties

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHot forming:

Data Source

PatentEP3793764B1Method for manufacturing a large structural component of a vehicle ; and method for manufacturing a unitary side panel for a door frame of a vehicle using such method
Publication Date: 2024.11.27 AUTOTECH ENG SL
  • EP3793764B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3793764B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3793764B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4b

AI summary

Methods and systems for laser cutting of components are disclosed herein. Examples are specifically suited for laser cutting relatively large components of e.g. a vehicle framework such as a unitary side panel of a vehicle door. Multiple robots may perform laser cutting operations substantially simultaneously.