Sidelink Channel Access Priority Class Table Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The selection of a channel access priority class (CAPC) table for sidelink communications on unlicensed spectrum is undefined, leading to inefficiencies in channel access procedures, particularly in determining the appropriate CAPC table based on sidelink mode, role, traffic type, and channel type, which affects listen-before-talk (LBT) processes and channel occupancy times.

Innovation Solution

A wireless communication device selects a CAPC table indicating a defer period and random number of sensing slots for sidelink channel access procedures based on sidelink mode, role, cast type of traffic, and channel type, allowing it to perform sidelink channel access using either a downlink (DL) CAPC table or uplink (UL) CAPC table, optimizing LBT times and channel access efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a CAPC table is selected based on multiple parameters (sidelink mode, role, traffic type, channel type), then channel access efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the channel access decision-making process into distinct parameters (sidelink mode, role, cast type, channel type) that can be independently evaluated. This segmentation allows the device to systematically determine the appropriate CAPC table by assessing each parameter separately rather than dealing with an undifferentiated complex decision, thereby improving channel access efficiency while managing device complexity through structured parameter evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If LBT sensing slots are increased to improve channel access reliability, then channel access reliability is improved, but transmission latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the number of LBT sensing slots variable rather than fixed. The device dynamically adjusts the number of sensing slots based on the selected CAPC table, which is determined by current channel conditions, sidelink mode, role, traffic type, and channel type. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize between reliability and latency adaptively - increasing sensing slots when reliability is paramount and reducing them when latency is critical, thus resolving the contradiction between these two parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240155686A1Channel access priority class table for unlicensed sidelink
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20240155686A1 patent drawing
  • US20240155686A1 patent drawing
  • US20240155686A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects relate to selection of a channel access priority class (CAPC) table for a sidelink channel access procedure on an unlicensed carrier in a sidelink network. A wireless communication device (e.g., a UE or sidelink device) may select between a downlink CAPC table and an uplink CAPC table based on at least one of a sidelink mode, a role of the wireless communication device in the sidelink network, a cast type of sidelink traffic to be transmitted by the wireless communication device, or a channel type of the sidelink traffic.