Sidelink Carrier Aggregation with Dynamic Component Carrier Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sidelink communication systems face challenges in dynamically allocating frequency-domain resources for carrier aggregation due to limitations in UE reception capabilities, necessitating improved protocols for selecting suitable component carriers to achieve high reliability, low latency, and increased data rates.

Innovation Solution

A method involving wireless communication nodes exchanging information to determine resource allocation for sidelink communication, including receiving and transmitting signals containing assistance information and threshold values to select suitable component carriers based on service type, quality of service requirements, and link quality, enabling dynamic allocation of carriers for carrier aggregation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If UEs are limited with their reception capabilities (number of supported CCs), then device complexity and cost are reduced, but the ability to achieve high data rates and capacity through carrier aggregation is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE reception capabilityVSAvoiddata rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic carrier selection where UEs can adaptively choose from multiple component carriers based on current channel conditions, service requirements, and available resources. The system dynamically adjusts the number and configuration of active carriers rather than being fixed, allowing UEs to optimize between complexity and data rate based on real-time needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters including the number of active component carriers, frequency selections, and carrier configurations based on service types and channel conditions. This allows the same UE hardware to achieve different data rates by reconfiguring which carriers are actively used, effectively decoupling hardware limitations from performance outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If more component carriers are combined for carrier aggregation, then peak data rates and network capacity are increased, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring suitable carriers and managing resource allocation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak data rateVSAvoidcarrier selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intermediary elements including predefined mapping relationships between service types and frequencies, assistance information messages exchanged between UEs, and network-configured parameters that guide carrier selection. These intermediaries simplify the complex task of identifying suitable carriers by providing structured guidance rather than requiring UEs to independently evaluate all possible carriers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring mapping relationships between service types and suitable frequency ranges, and by having UEs pre-identify and report their capability-supported frequencies to the network. This preliminary preparation reduces the real-time complexity of carrier aggregation setup by having much of the selection work done in advance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic resource allocation protocols are implemented for PC5-CA, then adaptability to different service types and channel conditions is improved, but the device complexity and protocol overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice type adaptabilityVSAvoidprotocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different resource allocation and carrier selection strategies tailored to specific service types (e.g., V2X, broadband, control signaling). Each service type receives customized configuration parameters and frequency mappings appropriate to its requirements, rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach. This localized optimization achieves high adaptability without requiring the entire system to be maximally complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12501471B2Method and apparatus for carrier aggregation in sidelink communication
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 ZTE CORP
  • US12501471B2 patent drawing
  • US12501471B2 patent drawing
  • US12501471B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for carrier aggregation is disclosed. In one embodiment, a method performed by a first wireless communication node, comprising: receiving a downlink signal containing first information from a second wireless communication node, and based on at least a portion of the first information, determining first resource information to perform sidelink communication between the first wireless communication node and at least one third wireless communication node.