Sidelink Feedback Preemption via SPI in Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing sidelink feedback preemption and uplink multiplexing, leading to potential interference and reduced network efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves identifying sidelink feedback resources and determining whether to transmit or preempt sidelink feedback based on a sidelink preemption indication (SPI) from a base station, considering factors such as priority, RSRP measurements, and resource pool IDs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sidelink feedback resources are allocated for providing HARQ feedback, then feedback transmission reliability is improved, but resource collision and interference increase when preemption occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback transmission reliabilityVSAvoidresource collision and interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The base station sends a sidelink preemption indication (SPI) before the actual feedback transmission to notify UEs of upcoming preemption. This allows receiving UEs to cancel their feedback transmissions in advance, avoiding resource collisions and interference while maintaining reliable feedback delivery for non-preempted transmissions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of allowing feedback transmission and then resolving conflicts, the system inverts the approach by first indicating preemption and then canceling feedback transmissions. The SPI mechanism inverts the traditional feedback flow by giving the base station control to preempt feedback resources before they are used

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Loss of time

If sidelink feedback is transmitted using PSFCH resources, then feedback latency is reduced, but resource allocation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback latencyVSAvoidresource allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-service by allowing receiving UEs to autonomously determine whether to transmit or cancel feedback based on the received SPI. Each UE independently evaluates the preemption indication against its own feedback transmission plans and makes cancellation decisions without requiring complex centralized coordination, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining low latency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If multiple UEs transmit sidelink feedback simultaneously, then network throughput is improved, but interference and collision probability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork throughputVSAvoidinterference and collision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback through the SPI mechanism where the base station monitors sidelink communication needs and provides preemption indications to UEs. This feedback loop allows the base station to control feedback transmission timing, enabling multiple UEs to transmit without collision by receiving appropriate preemption or non-preemption indications, thus maintaining high throughput while avoiding interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250056377A1Sidelink feedback preemption and uplink multiplexing in wireless communications
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250056377A1 patent drawing
  • US20250056377A1 patent drawing
  • US20250056377A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described in which multiple devices may implement sidelink communications for direct device-to-device exchange of information. Such devices (e.g., user equipment (UE) devices) may be configured with resources for sidelink communications, and may monitor for a sidelink preemption indication (SPI) from a base station and determine whether one or more sidelink communications is preempted based on the SPI. The sidelink communications may include a feedback communication that is transmitted using sidelink feedback resources. Based on an indication in a received SPI, it may be determined whether or not to transmit sidelink feedback. The sidelink feedback may be transmitted to one or more other sidelink devices, or to a base station, and preemption of the sidelink feedback may be determined based on one or more parameters associated with the sidelink communications, associated with the SPI, or any combinations thereof.