Sidelink Power Control Commands With Interference Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in accurately controlling sidelink transmit power, leading to interference and reduced battery life due to static or inaccurately adjusted power settings, particularly in LTE D2D and NR V2X communications.

Innovation Solution

Implementing closed-loop transmit power control methods where UEs adjust their power based on interference measurements and receive power control commands, enhancing accuracy and reducing interference and power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If static transmit power settings are used in sidelink communications, then device complexity is reduced, but interference increases and communication quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidpower control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements closed-loop power control where the receiving UE measures interference from sidelink transmissions and sends power control commands back to the transmitting UE. This feedback mechanism enables dynamic power adjustment based on actual interference conditions, resolving the contradiction between reducing interference and maintaining simple device operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static power settings to dynamic power control where transmit power is continuously adjusted based on real-time interference measurements. The power control commands enable the transmitting UE to adapt its power level dynamically, achieving better interference management without requiring overly complex device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If transmit power is increased to maintain communication quality, then communication reliability is improved, but battery consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidbattery consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic power control where transmit power is adjusted in real-time based on interference measurements and power control commands. This allows the system to use high power only when necessary for maintaining communication reliability, while reducing power consumption during conditions that allow lower power operation, thus optimizing the trade-off between reliability and battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the transmit power parameter dynamically based on measured interference conditions and received power control commands. By adjusting this key parameter according to actual channel conditions rather than using fixed high power settings, the system maintains communication reliability while minimizing unnecessary battery consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If transmit power is decreased to save battery life, then energy efficiency is improved, but interference measurement accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidinterference measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The receiving UE performs interference measurements and sends power control commands to the transmitting UE based on these measurements. This feedback loop ensures that even when transmit power is reduced for energy efficiency, the system maintains accurate awareness of interference conditions through the measurement and command exchange mechanism, resolving the contradiction between energy savings and measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If closed-loop power control is implemented, then power control accuracy is improved, but device complexity and signaling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control accuracyVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements closed-loop power control where the receiving UE measures interference and sends power control commands to the transmitting UE. This feedback mechanism achieves accurate power control by using actual measurements to guide power adjustments, while the implementation leverages existing communication protocols to minimize the increase in device complexity and signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4011137B1Sidelink transmit power control commands
Publication Date: 2025.10.08 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP4011137B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4011137B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4011137B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a source user equipment (UE) may transmit a first sidelink communication to a target UE. The source UE may receive, based at least in part on transmitting the first sidelink communication to the target UE, a transmit power control command for a second sidelink communication. The source UE may transmit the second sidelink communication using a transmit power determined based at least in part on the transmit power control command. Numerous other aspects are provided.