Sidelink Power Control Under Shared Spectrum Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of performing power control for sidelink signals in unlicensed or shared spectrum, where power limits are imposed, has not been adequately addressed in existing technologies.

Innovation Solution

A power control method for sidelink signals in shared spectrum is developed, considering factors such as power limits, maximum transmit power, sidelink priority, channel busy ratio, downlink path loss, and sidelink path loss to determine optimal transmit power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power control is performed for sidelink signals in unlicensed spectrum based on power limits, then compliance with spectrum regulations is improved, but transmit power flexibility and communication reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with power limitsVSAvoidtransmit power flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic power control by determining transmit power through multiple interconnected factors including power limits, maximum transmit power, sidelink priority, channel busy ratio, and path loss. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt transmit power in real-time based on current channel conditions and regulatory requirements, resolving the contradiction between compliance and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes multiple power-related parameters simultaneously (power limit, maximum transmit power, sidelink priority, channel busy ratio, downlink path loss, sidelink path loss) to determine optimal transmit power. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system maintains compliance with power limits while preserving adaptability to different transmission scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If transmit power is increased to overcome path loss, then communication coverage and reliability are improved, but interference to other signals and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication coverageVSAvoidinterference to other signals
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms by considering channel busy ratio and path loss measurements in the power control determination. The system continuously monitors channel conditions and adjusts transmit power accordingly, increasing power only when necessary to maintain coverage while minimizing interference through informed decision-making based on real-time feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by determining transmit power based on the minimum necessary to overcome path loss and maintain communication, rather than always using maximum power. The system calculates required power levels considering power limits and channel conditions, applying only the necessary power increment to achieve coverage while avoiding excessive power that would cause interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If power control considers multiple factors (priority, channel busy ratio, path loss), then transmission optimization is improved, but computational complexity and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission optimizationVSAvoidcontrol difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the power control determination into distinct components: power limit considerations, maximum transmit power constraints, sidelink priority factors, channel busy ratio assessments, and path loss calculations. By dividing the complex determination process into manageable segments, the system achieves comprehensive optimization while reducing the perceived complexity of control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal power control framework that handles multiple factors (power limits, maximum power, priority, channel busy ratio, downlink path loss, sidelink path loss) through a single integrated determination process. This multi-functional approach optimizes transmission across diverse scenarios using one cohesive control mechanism, improving productivity without proportionally increasing control difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250351094A1Power control method and terminal devices
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP LTD
  • US20250351094A1 patent drawing
  • US20250351094A1 patent drawing
  • US20250351094A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a power control method and terminal devices. The method comprises: a terminal device determining transmit power of a first sidelink signal in shared spectrum based onfollowing information: first transmit power, determined based on a power limit; second transmit power, determined based on a maximum transmit power of the terminal device; and fourth transmit power, determined based on a downlink path loss or the second transmit power.