Sidelink Pre-emption via Reservation Messages in NR V2X
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In NR V2X mode-2 operation, there is no explicit mechanism for a UE with higher priority packets to pre-empt a UE that has already reserved a resource with a lower priority level, leading to ambiguity in resource pre-emption and increased monitoring overhead.
Innovation Solution
A distributed pre-emption mechanism is proposed where UEs autonomously decide to pre-empt or monitor for pre-emption based on sidelink channel loading, using Channel Busy Ratio (CBR) thresholds and composite thresholds with traffic priority, to reduce ambiguity and monitoring overhead.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Extent of automation
If a distributed pre-emption mechanism is implemented without centralized control, then autonomy and flexibility of UEs are improved, but ambiguity in pre-emption decisions and increased monitoring overhead occur
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by introducing CBR thresholds as a dynamic parameter that UEs use to autonomously decide whether to monitor for pre-emption indications. When CBR exceeds a threshold, UEs start monitoring; when below, they stop. This parameter-based control resolves the contradiction by providing clear, unambiguous decision criteria that reduce monitoring overhead while maintaining UE autonomy in distributed pre-emption operations.
2Reliability
If UEs continuously monitor for pre-emption indications, then pre-emption reliability is improved, but power consumption and duplexing time waste increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements periodic action by making pre-emption indication monitoring conditional and intermittent rather than continuous. UEs monitor for pre-emption indications only when channel conditions warrant it (based on CBR thresholds and priority levels), and stop monitoring when conditions improve. This periodic monitoring approach maintains pre-emption reliability when needed while significantly reducing power consumption and duplexing time waste during normal operations.
3Reliability
If pre-emption mechanism is added to meet QoS requirements, then service quality for high-priority packets is improved, but system complexity and signaling overhead increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by making pre-emption monitoring and operation selective rather than universal. Different UEs monitor for pre-emption indications based on their local conditions including priority level, CBR thresholds, and channel state. High-priority UEs monitor more aggressively while low-priority UEs monitor less frequently or not at all. This localized approach ensures QoS for high-priority packets while minimizing overall system complexity and signaling overhead.
Data Source
AI summary
Methods for pre-emption of transmission resources in sidelink communications in a cellular network. A reservation message for resources which collide with previously-reserved resources serves as a pre-emption indicator.


