Sidelink Pre-emption via Reservation Messages in NR V2X

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In NR V2X mode-2 operation, there is no explicit mechanism for a UE with higher priority packets to pre-empt a UE that has already reserved a resource with a lower priority level, leading to ambiguity in resource pre-emption and increased monitoring overhead.

Innovation Solution

A distributed pre-emption mechanism is proposed where UEs autonomously decide to pre-empt or monitor for pre-emption based on sidelink channel loading, using Channel Busy Ratio (CBR) thresholds and composite thresholds with traffic priority, to reduce ambiguity and monitoring overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a distributed pre-emption mechanism is implemented without centralized control, then autonomy and flexibility of UEs are improved, but ambiguity in pre-emption decisions and increased monitoring overhead occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomy of UEs in pre-emption decisionsVSAvoidmonitoring overhead and ambiguity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing CBR thresholds as a dynamic parameter that UEs use to autonomously decide whether to monitor for pre-emption indications. When CBR exceeds a threshold, UEs start monitoring; when below, they stop. This parameter-based control resolves the contradiction by providing clear, unambiguous decision criteria that reduce monitoring overhead while maintaining UE autonomy in distributed pre-emption operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If UEs continuously monitor for pre-emption indications, then pre-emption reliability is improved, but power consumption and duplexing time waste increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-emption operation reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption for monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by making pre-emption indication monitoring conditional and intermittent rather than continuous. UEs monitor for pre-emption indications only when channel conditions warrant it (based on CBR thresholds and priority levels), and stop monitoring when conditions improve. This periodic monitoring approach maintains pre-emption reliability when needed while significantly reducing power consumption and duplexing time waste during normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If pre-emption mechanism is added to meet QoS requirements, then service quality for high-priority packets is improved, but system complexity and signaling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS for high-priority packetsVSAvoidpre-emption mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making pre-emption monitoring and operation selective rather than universal. Different UEs monitor for pre-emption indications based on their local conditions including priority level, CBR thresholds, and channel state. High-priority UEs monitor more aggressively while low-priority UEs monitor less frequently or not at all. This localized approach ensures QoS for high-priority packets while minimizing overall system complexity and signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12238760B2Pre-emption in sidelink communications
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 JRD COMM (SHENZHEN) LTD
  • US12238760B2 patent drawing
  • US12238760B2 patent drawing
  • US12238760B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for pre-emption of transmission resources in sidelink communications in a cellular network. A reservation message for resources which collide with previously-reserved resources serves as a pre-emption indicator.