Sidelink Resource Coordination via Priority and Power Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently coordinating sidelink communications between user equipment (UEs) to achieve high reliability and low latency, particularly in scenarios like vehicle-to-everything (V2X) and device-to-device (D2D) systems, where resource allocation and priority management are complex.

Innovation Solution

The described techniques enable UEs to receive and share resource information, including priority levels and reference signal received power thresholds, to determine optimal time and frequency resources for sidelink transmissions, allowing for efficient coordination and reduced latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If UEs share detailed resource information including priority levels and power thresholds, then coordination reliability improves, but communication overhead and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination reliabilityVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential elements needed for coordination (priority levels, power thresholds, resource allocations) from the complete resource information, transmitting only these critical parameters rather than full resource maps. This reduces the amount of data exchanged while maintaining the reliability needed for safe coordination in V2X and D2D communications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes preliminary coordination agreements and resource reservation indicators in advance, allowing UEs to pre-negotiate and reserve resources before actual transmission. This preliminary action reduces the need for real-time information exchange during critical transmission windows, thereby reducing latency while maintaining coordination reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If UEs monitor control information of other nearby UEs to generate resource information, then resource allocation efficiency improves, but processing complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by having each UE generate and share resource information tailored to its specific local context and requirements. Instead of all UEs processing and sharing complete system-wide resource maps, each UE creates localized resource information relevant to its immediate coordination needs, reducing processing complexity while maintaining allocation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by having UEs monitor and process only the subset of control information from other UEs that is relevant to their specific resource allocation decisions. Rather than processing all available control information from all nearby UEs, each UE selectively processes only the necessary portions, reducing computational complexity while maintaining efficient resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If UEs use priority levels to determine transmission resources, then spectral efficiency improves, but the complexity of priority management and resource coordination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidpriority management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by dynamically adjusting priority levels and associated power thresholds based on real-time channel conditions, traffic demands, and coordination requirements. This allows the system to maintain high spectral efficiency through priority-based resource allocation while adapting the complexity of priority management to match actual system needs rather than using fixed complex priority schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11889495B2Shared information for inter-user equipment coordination on a sidelink channel
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11889495B2 patent drawing
  • US11889495B2 patent drawing
  • US11889495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A device (such as a first user equipment (UE)) may communicate control signaling indicating a resource allocation for a sidelink channel. The first UE may receive, from a second UE, a first resource map. The first resource map may indicate a first sidelink transmission scheduled within a first time and frequency resource of the resource allocation, a first priority level of the first resource map, and a parameter threshold used to generate the first resource map. In some cases, the first UE may communicate a second sidelink transmission within the resource allocation for the sidelink channel based on the first resource map.