Sieve Shaker Control for Agricultural Harvester Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural harvesters face unnecessary wear and tear due to continuous side-to-side shaking motion of the sieve assembly, which is required at maximum capacity but not necessary at varying crop processing rates, leading to inefficient operation and component damage.

Innovation Solution

A control system that automatically adjusts the side-to-side shaking motion of the sieve assembly based on the current crop processing rate, using a proportionate calculation to minimize motion and prevent downhill pooling, thereby reducing stress on components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If continuous side-to-side shaking motion is applied to the sieve assembly, then material distribution is improved and downhill pooling is prevented, but wear and tear on mechanical components increases and operation efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial distribution uniformityVSAvoidcomponent durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a control system that dynamically adjusts the side-to-side shaking motion amplitude based on real-time throughput conditions. When throughput is high, greater shaking amplitude is applied to prevent pooling; when throughput is low, reduced amplitude minimizes wear. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between maintaining material distribution stability and preserving component durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the side shaker mechanism based on crop processing rate. The control system monitors throughput and proportionately adjusts the shaking motion parameters (amplitude, frequency) to match actual processing needs, thereby preventing unnecessary wear during low-throughput operations while ensuring adequate material distribution during high-throughput operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If maximum side-to-side shaking motion is continuously applied, then capacity and efficiency are maintained at maximum levels, but unnecessary wear and tear occurs during lower processing rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting capacityVSAvoidenergy waste from excessive motion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by providing only the amount of side-to-side shaking motion necessary for the current throughput level. Rather than continuously applying maximum motion, the control system proportionately adjusts the shaking intensity to match actual processing requirements, eliminating energy waste during lower throughput operations while maintaining adequate capacity during peak operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system incorporates feedback from throughput monitoring to continuously optimize the side shaker operation. By monitoring crop processing rate and adjusting shaking motion accordingly, the system ensures that energy is consumed only when and to the extent needed for maintaining harvesting capacity, thereby reducing energy waste from excessive motion during lower processing rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If operator settings are used to control side shaking motion, then operational flexibility is maintained, but operator skill and attention are required to prevent pooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidautomatic adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system provides self-service by automatically monitoring throughput and adjusting side-to-side shaking motion without operator intervention. The system proportionately calculates and applies the appropriate shaking amplitude based on real-time processing conditions, eliminating the need for operator skill and attention while maintaining both operational flexibility and automatic adjustment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated control system that uses sensors and proportionate calculation to determine optimal shaking motion. This substitution eliminates the need for operator skill and attention while maintaining operational flexibility, as the control system automatically adapts to varying throughput conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures efficient operation by adjusting the side-to-side shaking motion only as needed, reducing wear and tear on mechanical components and maintaining capacity and efficiency without relying on operator settings.

Implementation Method 1

a side shaker mechanism operable to produce a side to side shaking motion in the at least one sieve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS11723309B2Side shake rate based on machine throughputs
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 BLUE LEAF I P INC
  • US11723309B2 patent drawing
  • US11723309B2 patent drawing
  • US11723309B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural harvester has a chassis carrying a header for gathering a crop. The header is removably attached to a feeder housing for feeding the crop into the agricultural harvester to be processed. A threshing and separating system is connected to the feeder housing for separating grain from Material Other than Grain (MOG). A grain cleaning system is connected to the threshing and separating system for further cleaning the separated grain. The grain cleaning system has at least one sieve operable to oscillate fore and aft and a side shaker mechanism operable to produce a side to side shaking motion in the at least one sieve. A control system is connected to the side shaker mechanism and operable to automatically proportionately increase an amount of the side to side shaking motion as a function of an amount and type of crop being processed.