Sieve Support Structure Resisting Deformation in Agricultural Combines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural combine sieve support structures face deformation and fatigue cracking due to uneven loading conditions, particularly from traversing hillsides and surface irregularities, which existing solutions like large corner gussets or diagonal braces either obstruct airflow or increase mass, leading to further stress.

Innovation Solution

A sieve support structure featuring elongate rails with pivotally connected compression members and tension members that apply compression loads to maintain the rail assembly's shape, resisting deformation and accommodating pivotal connections to absorb uneven forces without cracking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If large corner gussets are used to reinforce the sieve rail assembly, then structural strength is improved, but the surface area for grain cleaning is decreased and upward air flow is obstructed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidsurface area for grain cleaning
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is divided into multiple discrete components: side rails, cross rails, and tension members. This segmentation allows the structure to achieve strength through the arrangement and connection of multiple elements rather than relying on large reinforcing gussets, thereby preserving the cleaning surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces tension members that extend diagonally across the space bounded by the rails, adding a diagonal dimension to the support structure. This creates a three-dimensional framework that provides structural strength without requiring additional area within the planar cleaning surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If large corner gussets are used to reinforce the sieve rail assembly, then structural strength is improved, but the mass of the assembly increases leading to increased loading conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmass of rail assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The structure uses multiple lightweight components (rails and tension members) distributed throughout the assembly rather than concentrating mass in large corner gussets. This segmentation achieves structural strength through geometric arrangement and force distribution rather than mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure combines rigid rails with tension members to create a composite framework that achieves high strength-to-weight ratio. The tension members provide structural reinforcement without the mass penalty of traditional gusseted connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If rigid welded connections are used in the sieve rail assembly, then structural integrity is maintained, but deformation from uneven loading results in fatigue cracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidresistance to fatigue cracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The connection between cross rails and side rails is made pivotal rather than rigidly fixed, allowing the structure to dynamically adapt to uneven loading conditions. This dynamic connection prevents stress concentration and fatigue cracking while maintaining structural integrity during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the connection parameter from rigid welded joints to pivotal connections with clearance, allowing small angular movements. This parameter change enables the structure to accommodate loading variations without developing fatigue cracks in the connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively maintains the structural integrity of sieve support structures by resisting racking and parallelogramming, reducing the likelihood of fatigue cracking and maintaining airflow efficiency, even under uneven loading conditions.

Implementation Method 1

said cross members are pivotally connected to the first and second rails and act as compression members

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivotal connection: Hinge

Implementation Method 2

the tension members being tensioned so as to simultaneously urge the rails against the compression members so as to apply a compression load thereagainst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP1932420B1Sieve support structure for an agricultural combine
Publication Date: 2010.03.24 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP1932420B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1932420B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1932420B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A sieve support structure (22) includes an elongate first rail (42), an elongate second rail (43), and rigid elongate compression members (46, 48) pivotally connected to and extending between the first and second rails at longitudinally spaced locations therealong. The rails and the compression members form a rail assembly (54) having a predetermined shape bounding a correspondingly shaped space (84). The rail assembly (54) is configured for supporting a sieve (24) of a cleaning system in at least substantially covering relation to the space. The support structure includes elongate tension members (86, 88) extending generally diagonally through the space and having opposite end portions connected to the first and second rails. The members (86, 88) are tensioned so as to simultaneously urge the rails (42, 43) against the compression members (46, 48) so as to apply a compression force thereagainst for retaining the rail assembly (54) in the predetermined shape in opposition to forces urging the assembly from the shape.