SiGe Thickness Uniformity via Protective Layer Etching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for growing silicon germanium (SiGe) layers in semiconductor devices face challenges in achieving uniform thickness and maintaining desirable geometry at the silicon-shallow trench isolation (STI) interface, leading to defects and poor performance due to over-etching and heterogeneous interfaces.

Innovation Solution

A protective layer is applied over the trench regions to prevent further etching and maintain device geometry, followed by selective coverage to ensure uniform SiGe growth, using a process that includes spin-coating a fluid protective layer, baking, and controlled etching to form a trench, thereby reducing Si loss and improving uniformity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional etching techniques are used to form trenches, then trench formation is achieved, but over-etching occurs leading to loss of silicon material and poor geometry at the Si-STI interface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrench geometry precisionVSAvoidsilicon material loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

A protective layer is deposited over the silicon surface before the etching process to prevent over-etching. This preliminary protective action ensures that the etching stops at the desired depth, maintaining trench geometry precision while preventing silicon material loss at the Si-STI interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The protective layer acts as an intermediary between the etchant and the silicon material. It allows controlled etching to proceed while preventing the etchant from attacking the silicon at the interface, thus resolving the contradiction between achieving trench depth and preventing material loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If conventional SiGe growth techniques are used, then SiGe layer formation is achieved, but non-uniform thickness and heterogeneous interfaces result

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSiGe layer thicknessVSAvoidSiGe thickness uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The protective layer provides localized protection at the Si-STI interface regions, creating different etching conditions in different areas. This ensures uniform SiGe thickness by preventing heterogeneous interface formation, while allowing the SiGe layer to grow to the desired quantity throughout the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The protective layer is applied before SiGe growth to prepare a uniform surface. This preliminary action ensures that the SiGe layer grows uniformly across the entire surface, including at previously problematic interface regions, achieving both desired thickness and uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Length of stationary object

If aggressive etching is used to ensure complete trench formation, then trench depth is achieved, but device geometry and clean corners/edges are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrench depthVSAvoiddevice geometry and corner sharpness
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The protective layer serves as an intermediary that allows deep trench formation while protecting the silicon surface and interface regions. The etchant can aggressively etch through the protective layer to achieve the required trench depth, while the protective layer prevents damage to the silicon geometry and maintains clean corners and edges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

By depositing the protective layer before etching, the silicon structure is pre-protected against geometric degradation. This allows subsequent aggressive etching to achieve the necessary trench depth without compromising the sharpness of corners and edges or overall device geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces Si loss and enhances the uniformity of SiGe growth, leading to improved device performance by maintaining clean corners and edges, reducing current leakage, and stabilizing the SiGe layer formation.

Implementation Method 1

A protective layer is applied over the trench regions to prevent further etching and maintain device geometry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier protection:

Implementation Method 2

spin-coating a fluid protective layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin coating: Spin Coating

Implementation Method 3

baking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS20160218005A1METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IMPROVED UNIFORMITY OF SiGe THICKNESS
Publication Date: 2016.07.28 SHANGHAI HUALI MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US20160218005A1 patent drawing
  • US20160218005A1 patent drawing
  • US20160218005A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process is used to form a protective layer to cover a divot between two regions of a semiconductor material. During etching processes, the protective layer protects the divot to be etched away and reduces material loss of a Silicon (Si)-shallow trench isolation (STI) substrate. A selective coverage is provided to protect the height of the Si-STI substrate and an Si-STI interface. A desirable geometry can be obtained for forming a silicon germanium (SiGe)layer with uniform thickness near the divot.