Sign Language Translation System Dynamic Process Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication systems lack efficient methods for translating sign language into language data and vice versa, especially in real-time communication sessions, which hinders effective communication between sign language users and non-sign language users.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically selects between different translation processes based on features of a communication session to translate sign language and language data, using machine learning models to generate video with sign language content from audio data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single translation process is used for all communication sessions, then the system is simple to implement, but it cannot achieve optimal translation accuracy for different communication scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between different translation processes (first translation process using sign language recognition and second translation process using other methods) based on communication session features. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize translation accuracy for different scenarios without requiring a completely complex redesign, as the selection logic is driven by observable session characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by switching between different translation processes based on detected communication session features. When specific features are detected, the system transitions from one translation approach to another, effectively adjusting the translation methodology to match the communication context and improve overall accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple translation processes are available for different communication scenarios, then translation accuracy improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic selection among multiple translation processes based on real-time analysis of communication session features. This allows the system to maintain high translation accuracy across diverse scenarios while managing complexity through automated, feature-driven process selection rather than requiring manual configuration for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary selection mechanism that automatically chooses between the first translation process (sign language recognition) and the second translation process based on communication features. This intermediary layer manages the complexity of having multiple translation processes by providing a unified decision-making interface that selects the appropriate process without exposing the underlying complexity to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automatic selection between translation processes is implemented, then communication efficiency improves, but processing time may increase due to feature analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of communication session features at the beginning of each session to determine which translation process to use. By making this selection decision upfront based on pre-analyzed features, the system avoids repeated analysis during the communication, thereby improving overall efficiency while minimizing the time penalty of the initial feature analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs only the necessary feature analysis required to distinguish between communication scenarios that require different translation processes. Rather than analyzing all possible features in depth, the system focuses on the key discriminating features, reducing processing time while still achieving accurate translation process selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250165722A1Sign language translation
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 SORENSON IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US20250165722A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165722A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165722A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may include obtaining, at a system, audio during a communication session that includes a first device and a second device. In these and other embodiments, the audio may originate at the second device. The method may further include selecting, automatically and independently by the system based on one or more features of the communication session, a first translation process instead of a second translation process to translate between sign language and language data during the communication session. The method may also include using the selected one of the first translation process and the second translation process to generate a video that includes sign language content based on the audio.