Signal Analyzer for Periodic and Random Interference Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting anomalies in electrical signals are inefficient due to the random and ephemeral nature of signal distortions, requiring large amounts of memory and processing power, making it difficult to detect and compensate for periodic and random interference in real-time.

Innovation Solution

A signal analyzer equipped with a divergence detector for periodic interference and an information detector for random events, using statistical analysis and output circuitry to compensate for anomalies, employing techniques like spectrogram computation, Kullback-Leibler divergence metric, and information content analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional methods capture large sets of sample data to detect random distortions, then detection capability improves, but memory requirements and processing power increase unreasonably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidmemory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the signal analysis into two distinct detectors: a divergence detector for periodic interference and an information detector for random events. This segmentation allows each detector to specialize in specific types of anomalies, improving detection efficiency without requiring large memory resources. The divergence detector uses sequential probability ratio tests on segmented signal portions, while the information detector analyzes information content changes, both operating with minimal memory footprint compared to traditional comprehensive capture methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary classification of interference types before detailed analysis. By first determining whether interference is periodic or random using the divergence detector, the system can then apply the appropriate detection method (information detector for random events). This preliminary action avoids the need to process and store all possible signal variations, significantly reducing memory requirements while maintaining high detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If traditional methods analyze large amounts of captured data, then anomaly detection accuracy improves, but processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides signal analysis into specialized segments: periodic interference detection using divergence measures and random event detection using information content analysis. Each segment processes only relevant data types, avoiding the computational burden of analyzing all signal characteristics comprehensively. This segmented approach maintains high detection accuracy while significantly reducing processing time compared to traditional methods that must evaluate all possible anomalies in captured datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the analytical parameters used for detection based on the type of interference identified. For periodic interference, it uses divergence measures (KL-divergence) that efficiently detect deviations from expected periodic patterns. For random events, it uses information content metrics that measure unexpected information in the signal. These parameter changes enable accurate detection with minimal computational effort for each specific anomaly type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system compensates for both periodic and random interference, then signal reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal reliabilityVSAvoidanalyzer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the compensation function into two specialized detectors: a divergence detector for periodic interference compensation and an information detector for random event compensation. Each detector is optimized for its specific interference type, using straightforward algorithms (sequential probability ratio tests for divergence, information content calculation for random events). This segmentation achieves comprehensive compensation for both interference types while keeping individual detector structures simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal anomaly detection framework that handles both periodic and random interference through a common architectural structure. The output circuitry receives inputs from both detectors and provides unified compensation, making the system multi-functional without requiring separate complex processing paths. This universal approach improves signal reliability across different interference types while avoiding the complexity of entirely separate compensation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8175829B2Analyzer for signal anomalies
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US8175829B2 patent drawing
  • US8175829B2 patent drawing
  • US8175829B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A signal analyzer includes a divergence detector for detecting periodic interference in a signal, an information detector for detecting a random event in the signal, and output circuitry for providing compensation for the periodic interference and the random event.