Signal Explanation for Nonlinear Machine Condition Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex systems, such as industrial machinery, face challenges in accurately monitoring and maintaining components due to sensor degradation, failure, and sub-optimal use, leading to inefficiencies and uncertainties in maintenance decisions, exacerbated by the complexity of non-linear classification models and the difficulty in attributing signal values to specific conditions.

Innovation Solution

A signal classification and explanation system that identifies significant signals associated with assessment results, enables sub-grouping of signals by system sub-components, and provides causal analysis to inform maintenance decisions, using feature identification logic, clustering, vector classification, and causal analysis logic to generate independent models for prediction and explanation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If non-linear classification models are used to analyze complex system conditions, then measurement precision and diagnostic accuracy are improved, but device complexity and difficulty of detecting and measuring signal contributions worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an explanation module as an intermediary between the non-linear classification model and the user. This module translates complex model predictions into human-understandable explanations by identifying and highlighting the most significant input signals, thereby bridging the gap between high accuracy and interpretability without requiring changes to the underlying complex model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct human interpretation of complex non-linear models with an automated computational explanation system. Instead of relying on human experts to manually analyze complex signal interactions, the system automatically computes and presents simplified explanations of which signals most influenced the diagnostic outcome

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If non-linear classification models are used to analyze complex system conditions, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation worsens due to inability to attribute signal values to conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondition assessment accuracyVSAvoidsignal attribution difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The explanation module serves as an intermediary that translates the black-box outputs of non-linear models into interpretable information. It identifies which input signals most strongly influenced each predictive output and presents this information in a user-friendly format, enabling operators to understand signal contributions without simplifying the underlying complex model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If maintenance decisions rely on human expert judgment, then adaptability to varying system conditions is improved, but loss of information increases due to limited availability and variability of expert knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance decision flexibilityVSAvoidexpert knowledge availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automating the maintenance decision-making process. The classification model automatically assesses system conditions and generates maintenance recommendations based on sensor data, eliminating dependence on human expert availability. The explanation module further enhances this by providing transparent reasoning for automated decisions, allowing operators to confidently follow system recommendations without requiring expert intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If conventional aggregate analysis methods are used to identify signals associated with conditions, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision worsens due to misleading aggregate results from multiple signal combinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis method simplicityVSAvoidsignal-condition association accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by breaking down the complex analysis into two distinct components: a classification model for accurate condition assessment and a separate explanation module for identifying significant signals. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high measurement precision in both condition detection and signal attribution without requiring a single simplified method that would compromise either function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11972178B2System and method for explanation of condition predictions in complex systems
Publication Date: 2024.04.30 FALKONRY INC
  • US11972178B2 patent drawing
  • US11972178B2 patent drawing
  • US11972178B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and methods to identify which signals are significant to an assessment of a complex machine system state in the presence of non-linearities and disjoint groupings of condition types. The system enables sub-grouping of signals corresponding to system sub-components or regions. Explanations of signal significance are derived to assist in causal analysis and operational feedback to the system is prescribed and implemented for the given condition and causality.