Signal Processing Interface Block Transaction Abort Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern signal processing systems face challenges in rapidly aborting a high number of transactions to enable the execution of new tasks in real-time, leading to system performance impacts due to high buffering capacity and multiple outstanding transactions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that pipelines the processing of 'old' tasks by aborting low-priority transactions and executing 'new' tasks, using a dedicated filtering unit to discard pending transactions marked as aborted, and reassigning identifiers to new tasks, allowing for efficient execution of new transactions upon receiving an abort signal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the system maintains high buffering capacity and multiple outstanding transactions to improve throughput, then productivity increases, but the ability to rapidly abort transactions and switch to new tasks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction throughputVSAvoidtask switching delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-allocates identifier registers and maintains abort status flags ready in advance. When an abort signal arrives, the interface block can immediately mark transactions as aborted using pre-prepared identifier registers, eliminating the need for sequential processing and enabling instant task switching while maintaining high buffering capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The transaction management is segmented into independent identifier registers, each capable of being independently marked as aborted. This segmentation allows selective abortion of specific transactions without affecting others, enabling rapid task switching while maintaining overall system throughput through parallel transaction handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the system processes a high number of pending transactions to improve resource utilization, then productivity increases, but the complexity of managing and aborting these transactions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidtransaction management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each identifier register is self-contained with its own abort status flag and filtering capability. The filtering unit automatically compares incoming transaction identifiers against the abort status flags and discards aborted transactions without requiring complex centralized management logic, reducing overall system complexity while handling numerous pending transactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The filtering unit acts as an intermediary between the identifier registers and the transaction processing pipeline. It automatically intercepts and filters out aborted transactions based on identifier comparison, shielding the complex transaction management from the main processing flow and simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the system maintains pipeline fullness to improve throughput, then productivity increases, but the ability to discard old tasks and execute new tasks in real-time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipeline throughputVSAvoidreal-time task switching capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains identifier registers and abort status flags in a ready state within the pipeline, allowing immediate task switching when abort signals arrive. This preliminary preparation enables real-time adaptability without emptying the pipeline, as the filtering mechanism is already in place to handle aborted transactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The pipeline maintains dynamic flexibility through individually controllable identifier registers and abort flags. Each transaction identifier can be independently marked for abortion, allowing the pipeline to dynamically adjust and discard specific old tasks while continuing to process other transactions, maintaining fullness and throughput while enabling real-time task switching

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9632793B2Method and device for aborting transactions, related system and computer program product
Publication Date: 2017.04.25 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US9632793B2 patent drawing
  • US9632793B2 patent drawing
  • US9632793B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Current tasks being executed in a set of modules of a signal processing system managed via an interface block are aborted so as to permit the execution of new tasks by pipelining eliminating transactions of said current tasks and executing transactions of the new tasks. Upon arrival of a signal to abort the current tasks, data and/or memory accesses present in said interface block are discarded.