Signed API Headers With Timestamp Checks for Network Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Network communications are vulnerable to cybercrimes, such as malware attacks, phishing, and ransomware, which compromise private information and disrupt system operations, leading to resource wastage in mitigation efforts.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a cyber security service provider's control infrastructure that uses optimized header information, including a signature header signed with a manager private key and a timestamp header, to authenticate requests and ensure authorized access, thereby preventing unauthorized access and protecting sensitive data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional network communication protocols are used without optimized header information, then network compatibility and ease of operation are maintained, but network security and protection against cybercrimes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork securityVSAvoidheader information structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The header information is segmented into distinct functional components: a signature header containing cryptographic authentication data, a timestamp header for temporal validation, and action description headers for request specification. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific security function independently while maintaining overall protocol compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The manager device performs preliminary cryptographic actions by signing the request message with its private key before transmission. The signature header is prepared in advance containing the digital signature, enabling the infrastructure device to authenticate the request without requiring complex real-time verification protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If signature headers with digital signatures are implemented for authentication, then unauthorized access is prevented, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidrequest verification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The infrastructure device performs partial verification by checking the timestamp header to determine if the request is within the valid time window before performing full cryptographic signature verification. This partial check filters out obviously invalid requests, reducing the computational burden and time for legitimate request processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The signature header contains a signature version parameter that enables different verification algorithms or validation strictness levels. By changing the signature version, the system can optimize between security rigor and processing speed based on operational requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If timestamp headers with predetermined duration limits are used, then replay attacks are prevented, but network synchronization requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplay attack preventionVSAvoidtime synchronization mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The timestamp header acts as an intermediary mechanism between the manager device and infrastructure device for temporal validation. Instead of requiring direct complex time synchronization protocols, the timestamp serves as a portable temporal credential that can be verified against the current time, simplifying the synchronization requirement to basic clock comparison

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a predetermined duration threshold that is intentionally longer than the maximum expected network latency or clock drift. This excessive time window ensures that legitimate requests are not rejected due to minor timing variations, while still preventing replay attacks that occur outside the acceptable timeframe

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If optimized header information with multiple validation fields is implemented, then access control precision is improved, but ease of operation and implementation difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control accuracyVSAvoidimplementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The signature header structure is designed to be universal and compatible with standard cryptographic libraries and protocols. By using widely-supported digital signature algorithms and formats, the implementation leverages existing tools and expertise, reducing the difficulty of implementation while maintaining high access control precision through multiple validation fields

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260067101A1Optimized header information to enable access control
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 UAB 360 IT
  • US20260067101A1 patent drawing
  • US20260067101A1 patent drawing
  • US20260067101A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method determining, by a manager device that is responsible for managing network services provided by an infrastructure device, a manager request including (i) action description information that indicates an action to be performed by the infrastructure device, and (ii) path information that indicates an API to be utilized by the infrastructure device to enable performance of the action; transmitting, by the manager device to the infrastructure device, the manager request to request performance of the action; and receiving, by the manager device from the infrastructure device, an authorization message indicating successful authorization of the manager request, whereby indicating performance of the action, wherein the successful authorization is based at least in part on a verification that a time difference between a point in time when the manager request was determined and a current time satisfies a predetermined duration of time is disclosed. Various other aspects are contemplated.