Signed Reputation Assertions for Fraud-Resistant Transactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing automation of business transactions has led to concerns about identity theft and fraud, as the speed and convenience of transactions magnify both risks and gains, with existing systems lacking effective mechanisms to verify the trustworthiness of unknown or unverified parties.

Innovation Solution

A method for expressing and evaluating signed reputation assertions, where a first entity generates a signed assertion by binding a piece of content to a reputation statement using reputation-forming information, allowing for secure transmission and evaluation within a transaction process, enabling the transformation of unverified parties into provisionally trusted ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automation of business transactions is increased to improve speed and convenience, then transaction efficiency is improved, but the risk of fraud and identity theft increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction speedVSAvoidtransaction security
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a reputation assertion mechanism as an intermediary layer between transacting parties. Third-party providers generate signed reputation assertions about entities, which are then evaluated by relying parties. This mediator system enables automated transactions to proceed with verified trust information, resolving the contradiction by maintaining high transaction speed while incorporating security verification through reputation assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If reputation verification mechanisms are implemented to improve transaction security, then fraud risk is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reputation verification system into distinct functional components: (1) third-party providers who generate reputation assertions, (2) signature generation mechanisms that cryptographically sign assertions, and (3) evaluation modules that assess assertions by relying parties. This segmentation allows each component to operate independently with well-defined interfaces, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive security verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces standardized reputation assertion structures as intermediaries that simplify interactions between diverse systems. The assertion format includes standardized fields for entity identification, reputation metrics, and cryptographic signatures, enabling different systems to exchange trust information without complex custom integration, thus reducing system complexity while improving security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If signed reputation assertions are generated and evaluated, then trustworthiness verification is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrust verification accuracyVSAvoidverification processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having third-party providers generate and sign reputation assertions in advance of transactions. Assertions are created based on pre-collected reputation-forming information and stored ready for use. When transactions occur, relying parties can immediately retrieve and evaluate pre-generated assertions without delay, thus maintaining high trust verification accuracy while minimizing processing time during actual transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8571990B2System and method for expressing and evaluating signed reputation assertions
Publication Date: 2013.10.29 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US8571990B2 patent drawing
  • US8571990B2 patent drawing
  • US8571990B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for expressing and evaluating signed reputation assertions is disclosed. In one embodiment, a first entity receives a request to generate a signed assertion relating to a piece of content. The first entity generates a reputation statement about a second entity from reputation-forming information (RFI) about the second entity available to the first entity. The first entity then generates a signed assertion from the reputation statement and the piece of content at least in part by binding the piece of content to the reputation statement and signing a portion encompassing at least one of the bound piece of content and the bound reputation statement. The signed assertion is then transmitted to a receiving entity.