Silage Compacting Vehicle Control for Location-Dependent Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing silage compacting methods require more energy and time due to uniform compacting actions over non-uniform silage surfaces, leading to unnecessary compaction of already compacted regions.

Innovation Solution

A compacting vehicle controlled by an electronic control device varies its compacting action location-dependently based on local silage properties, adjusting velocity, pressure, and contact force to achieve desired density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If uniform compacting action is applied over the entire silage surface, then the compacting vehicle ensures consistent compaction force, but energy and time are wasted on already compacted regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompacting uniformityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different compacting actions to different locations on the silage surface based on detected properties. The electronic control device receives data about local silage characteristics and adjusts compacting parameters (force, velocity, number of passes) accordingly, ensuring that already compacted regions receive minimal additional action while poorly compacted areas receive intensified treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The compacting vehicle dynamically adjusts its operating parameters during the compacting process. The system modifies velocity, contact force, and pass frequency in real-time based on feedback from sensors detecting silage density and compacting status, transitioning from static uniform compaction to dynamic adaptive compaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If uniform compacting action is applied over the entire silage surface, then the compacting vehicle maintains simple operation, but time consumption increases due to unnecessary compaction cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidcompacting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors that detect silage properties and compacting status, feeding this information back to the electronic control device. Based on this feedback, the system automatically adjusts compacting parameters without requiring manual intervention, maintaining ease of operation while significantly reducing time consumption by avoiding redundant compaction passes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If location-dependent compacting action is implemented, then energy and time consumption are reduced, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The silage surface is divided into discrete detection zones or segments, with sensors measuring properties at multiple locations. The electronic control device processes data from these segmented measurements and applies appropriate compacting actions to each segment, managing complexity through systematic zonation rather than continuous analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of energy

If location-dependent compacting action is implemented, then energy and time consumption are reduced, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiddensity uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies excessive compacting action to certain areas initially, then uses feedback from density sensors to determine where additional passes are needed. This approach ensures that all areas reach the target density threshold, with the control system adjusting the number and intensity of passes based on actual measured conditions rather than predetermined patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12520769B2Method, control device and compacting vehicle for compacting harvested crops in a silo
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 DEERE & CO
  • US12520769B2 patent drawing
  • US12520769B2 patent drawing
  • US12520769B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for compacting silage in a silo includes controlling a compacting vehicle via an electronic control device, passing over the silage deposited in the silo with the compacting vehicle, exerting a compacting action along a compacting path via the compacting vehicle, and varying the compacting action of the compacting vehicle in a location-dependent manner along the compacting path by the action of the control device.