Silica Depletion Zone Ceramic Cores for Reactive Alloy Casting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for forming ceramic cores in investment casting, particularly for complex geometries like turbine blades, face challenges due to reactivity between silica-based cores and reactive metal alloys, leading to oxidation and bonding issues, which hinder the production of intricate internal channels and increase the difficulty of core removal.

Innovation Solution

A method involving heat-treating a ceramic body in a non-oxidizing atmospheric condition to form a silica depletion zone, primarily using mullite and alumina, which reduces reactivity with alloying elements and allows for the creation of a monolithic ceramic core with a silica depletion zone encapsulating an inner zone of alumina and mullite, facilitating easier removal and improved durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If silica-based ceramic cores are used in investment casting of reactive metal alloys, then the cores provide high processability and ease of removal, but they react with alloying elements causing oxidation and bonding issues

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprocessabilityVSAvoidreactivity with alloying elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ceramic core is designed with non-uniform composition: the outer surface layer contains depleted silica content (lower reactivity) while the inner core maintains conventional silica composition (higher processability). This gradient structure allows the surface to resist reaction with reactive alloying elements while the interior provides the desired manufacturing properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The ceramic core comprises a composite structure with at least two distinct zones: an outer silica depletion zone and an inner silica-containing zone. This composite architecture combines the low-reactivity characteristic of alumina-rich regions with the high-processability of silica-rich regions, resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and harmful reactivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If conventional silica-based ceramic cores are used, then the cores are easy to process and remove, but they cause internal oxidation and loss of alloying elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of removalVSAvoidoxidation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The outer silica depletion zone acts as an intermediary barrier between the molten reactive alloy and the inner silica-containing core. This intermediate layer prevents direct contact and reaction between the reactive alloying elements and the silica, thereby preventing internal oxidation while maintaining the ability to remove the core after casting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If alumina is used instead of silica to reduce reactivity, then oxidation resistance improves, but processing requires higher temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation resistanceVSAvoidprocessing temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The ceramic core is designed with non-uniform composition: the outer surface layer contains depleted silica content (lower reactivity)while the inner core maintains conventional silica composition (higher processability). This gradient structure allows the surface to resist reaction with reactive alloying elements while the interior provides the desired manufacturing properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The ceramic core comprises a composite structure with at least two distinct zones: an outer silica depletion zone and an inner silica-containing zone. This composite architecture combines the low-reactivity characteristic of alumina-rich regions with the high-processability of silica-rich regions, resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and harmful reactivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively reduces reactivity with reactive metal alloys, allows for the production of complex internal channels, and ensures the ceramic core can be easily removed without compromising the mechanical properties of the cast components, enhancing the thermodynamic efficiency and durability of turbine blades.

Implementation Method 1

heat-treating a ceramic body in a non-oxidizing atmospheric condition for an effective temperature and time combination to form a silica depletion zone at a surface of the ceramic core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 2

The non-oxidizing atmospheric condition has a pressure less than 10^-2 atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation prevention: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS10364189B2Methods for forming ceramic cores
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US10364189B2 patent drawing
  • US10364189B2 patent drawing
  • US10364189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for forming ceramic cores are disclosed. A ceramic core formed using the method of the present application includes a silica depletion zone encapsulating an inner zone. The inner zone includes mullite and the silica depletion zone includes alumina. The method includes heat-treating a ceramic body in a non-oxidizing atmospheric condition for an effective temperature and time combination at a pressure less than 10−2 atmosphere to form the silica depletion zone at a surface of the ceramic core.