Silicified Zero-Valent Iron for Heavy Metal Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Zero-valent iron used for heavy metal and organic pollutant removal faces challenges such as passivation, agglomeration, and decreased catalytic activity due to oxide layer formation, leading to inefficiencies and potential secondary pollution.

Innovation Solution

A silicified modified zero-valent iron is developed by forming a silicon-containing oxide layer on its surface through ball milling with dissolved silicate and micron iron powder, enhancing its activity and selectivity for heavy metal removal and catalytic performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If zero-valent iron is used for heavy metal removal, then low cost and environmental friendliness are achieved, but passivation and agglomeration occur leading to decreased activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost-effectivenessVSAvoidactivity stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-modifying the surface of zero-valent iron with silicate before deployment. This creates a protective silicified oxide layer that prevents passivation and agglomeration during service, maintaining catalytic activity over time while preserving the cost-effectiveness of zero-valent iron

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite material structure by combining zero-valent iron with silicate modification. The resulting silicified modified zero-valent iron combines the low cost of iron with the protective and catalytic properties of silicate, achieving both economic viability and reliable long-term performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-generated harmful factors

If oxide layer is formed on zero-valent iron surface, then adsorption and complexation of heavy metals are enhanced, but electron transmission is hindered reducing catalytic activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheavy metal removal capabilityVSAvoidcatalytic activity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the composition and structure of the oxide layer through silicate treatment. This transforms the surface chemistry to achieve optimal balance between heavy metal adsorption capacity and electron transmission efficiency, enabling both functions to coexist

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating a differentiated surface structure where the silicified oxide layer provides specific local sites for heavy metal adsorption while maintaining electron-conductive pathways. The modification is localized to the surface, preserving bulk iron properties while enhancing surface functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If bimetal or sulfur modification is used to improve zero-valent iron activity, then catalytic performance is enhanced, but secondary pollution from toxic metal dissolution or sulfur elements occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidsecondary pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses silicate modification instead of bimetallic or sulfur-based modifications, employing environmentally benign materials that do not introduce toxic substances. The silicate layer acts as a protective coating that can be safely disposed of or regenerated without causing secondary pollution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the modification approach from toxic bimetallic or sulfur compounds to environmentally friendly silicate-based modification. This parameter change in material composition eliminates the risk of secondary pollution while maintaining enhanced catalytic activity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If ball milling with silicate is used to form silicified oxide layer, then continuous ferrous iron supply and heavy metal separation are improved, but additional processing steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveferrous iron supply continuityVSAvoidpreparation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing silicate modification through ball milling during the material preparation phase. This preliminary treatment creates the protective and catalytically active silicified oxide layer before the zero-valent iron is deployed for heavy metal removal, ensuring continuous ferrous iron supply without adding complexity to the application phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The silicified modified zero-valent iron achieves continuous ferrous iron supply, improved heavy metal separation, and efficient treatment of refractory organic pollutants, avoiding secondary pollution and enabling large-scale production with a green and cost-effective process.

Implementation Method 1

The oxide layer formed by oxidation in the aqueous solution hinders the outward transmission of zero-valent iron electrons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

the use of zero-valent iron to activate persulfate has become a very promising technology in the treatment of refractory organic pollutant wastewater. This technology can produce sulfate radicals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

promote the corrosion and dissolution of zero-valent iron and improve the catalytic activity of zero-valent iron

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCorrosion: Crevice Corrosion

Implementation Method 4

regulating the corrosion behavior of zero-valent iron and the release rate of ferrous iron

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution:

Data Source

PatentUS11850664B2Silicified modified zero-valent iron and its preparation method and application
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 CHINESE RES ACAD OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCI
  • US11850664B2 patent drawing
  • US11850664B2 patent drawing
  • US11850664B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A silicified modified zero-valent iron, whose surface layer is a silicon-containing oxide layer formed by silicate, which is obtained by the following method: dissolved silicate and micron iron powder are used as raw materials and mixed in proportion, and ball milling under an inert gas atmosphere to obtain the silicified modified zero-valent iron. The invention also discloses the application of silicified modified zero-valent iron in repairing polluted water bodies. The invention uses green silicate as silicon source to carry out surface silicification modification of micron zero-valent iron, which has simple operation, low cost and is convenient for large-scale production. Moreover, the prepared silicified zero-valent iron has good dispersibility, high reduction activity and strong recycling performance, and can be used for the treatment of various polluted water bodies and soil.