Silicon Negative Electrode Thermal Stability via Chain Carbonate Electrolyte

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithium-ion secondary batteries using silicon as a negative electrode face challenges in maintaining cycle characteristics and thermal stability due to volume variation during charging/discharging, leading to deterioration of battery performance.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a negative electrode with silicon and an electrolytic solution containing chain carbonate and cyclic carbonate, specifically diethyl carbonate, which improves cycle characteristics and thermal stability by reducing heat generation during charging/discharging cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If silicon is used as negative electrode material to increase capacity, then energy density is improved, but volume variation during charging/discharging causes particle miniaturization and contact property deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenegative electrode capacityVSAvoidcycle characteristic
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the electrolytic solution by specifying chain carbonates with carbon numbers of 4 or more (such as diethyl carbonate, dipropyl carbonate) and limiting methyl carbonate content to 5 vol% or less. These parameter changes in the electrolyte composition stabilize the solid electrolyte interface film on silicon particles, preventing volume variation-induced deterioration and maintaining cycle characteristics while utilizing silicon's high capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If silicon is used as negative electrode material, then discharge electric potential is reduced, but volume variation causes contact properties between current collector and conductive auxiliary agent to decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedischarge electric potentialVSAvoidcontact property
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the electrolytic solution composition parameters by using chain carbonates with carbon numbers of 4 or more and limiting methyl carbonate, which stabilizes the solid electrolyte interface film. This stabilization prevents volume variation during charging/discharging, thereby maintaining contact properties between the current collector and conductive auxiliary agent on the silicon-based negative electrode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If methyl carbonate is used in electrolytic solution to improve ion conductivity, then battery performance is enhanced, but it promotes decomposition of solid electrolyte interface film on silicon electrode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveion conductivityVSAvoidsolid electrolyte interface film stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrolytic solution composition by limiting methyl carbonate content to 5 vol% or less and introducing chain carbonates with carbon numbers of 4 or more (such as diethyl carbonate). This parameter change reduces the decomposition of the solid electrolyte interface film on silicon electrodes while maintaining adequate ion conductivity through the alternative carbonate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If chain carbonate with short carbon number is used, then electrolyte performance is improved, but negative electrode stability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrolyte performanceVSAvoidnegative electrode stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chain carbonate parameter by specifying carbon numbers of 4 or more (such as diethyl carbonate with 4 carbons, dipropyl carbonate with 6 carbons). This parameter change in the electrolyte composition provides sufficient negative electrode stability by forming a more stable solid electrolyte interface film, while still maintaining good electrolyte performance through the chain carbonate structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of silicon in the negative electrode with a suitable electrolytic solution composition enhances cycle characteristics and thermal stability, preventing deterioration and improving battery performance.

Implementation Method 1

an amount of heat generation, which is measured by a differential scanning calorimeter within a range of 210 to 380° C. during full charge, is 850 J/g or less

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat generation: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

an amount of heat generation, which is measured by a differential scanning calorimeter within a range of 210 to 380° C. during full charge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential scanning calorimetry: Calorimetry

Data Source

PatentUS9660258B2Lithium-ion secondary battery
Publication Date: 2017.05.23 TDK CORP
  • US9660258B2 patent drawing
  • US9660258B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The negative electrode is formed from silicon, an amount of heat generation in a negative electrode, which is measured by a differential scanning calorimeter within a range of 210 to 380° C. during full charge, is 850 J/g or less, and a cyclic carbonate including ethylene carbonate and a chain carbonate which has a chemical formula expressed by R1—O—CO—OR2, and in which R1 and R2 represent an alkyl group having a carbon number of 2 or more are used for an electrolytic solution.