Silicon Negative Electrode Structure for Stable Battery Cycling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Silicon-based negative electrode materials in lithium secondary batteries face issues of surface oxidation leading to hydrogen gas generation, phase instability, and capacity degradation due to electrode contraction and expansion during charge and discharge, posing risks of explosion and deteriorating performance.

Innovation Solution

A negative electrode with controlled cohesion strength and vertical resistance is developed, maintaining uniformity across the electrode thickness, using silicon-based active materials, conductive materials, and specific preparation methods to ensure cohesion strength ranges from 1 MPa to 20 MPa and vertical resistance from 0.005Ω to 0.3Ω, minimizing capacity degradation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If silicon-based active material is used in negative electrode, then capacity is improved, but surface oxidation occurs leading to hydrogen gas generation and phase instability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidphase stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite structure where silicon-based active material particles are embedded in a porous carbon matrix. This composite design allows the silicon to provide high capacity while the carbon matrix prevents surface oxidation, maintains phase stability, and accommodates volume expansion during lithium insertion/extraction cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs porous carbon material with controlled pore structure to host silicon particles. The porous structure provides adequate space for silicon expansion during lithiation, prevents particle aggregation, and allows efficient electrolyte penetration while maintaining structural integrity and preventing surface oxidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Strength

If electrode cohesion strength is increased to prevent contraction and expansion damage, then electrode integrity is improved, but internal network connectivity may be impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecohesion strengthVSAvoidinternal network connectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates local variations in cohesion strength by forming a gradient structure where the carbon matrix density varies through the electrode thickness. The region near the current collector has higher cohesion strength to prevent delamination, while inner regions maintain porosity for ion transport, thus achieving both structural integrity and internal connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes cohesion strength parameters within a specific range (1-20 MPa) rather than maximizing it. By controlling the carbon content, pore size distribution, and binding agent composition, the electrode achieves sufficient mechanical strength while maintaining adequate porosity for electrolyte penetration and ion transport pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If vertical resistance is reduced to improve conductivity, then charge and discharge performance is improved, but electrode deterioration may increase during cycling

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconductivityVSAvoidelectrode durability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes vertical resistance within a specific range (0.005-0.3 Ω) by controlling carbon particle size distribution, carbon content, and compaction density. This balanced approach ensures sufficient electron transport pathways for good conductivity while maintaining structural integrity to prevent electrode deterioration during repeated charge-discharge cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the lifespan and capacity of lithium secondary batteries by maintaining electrode integrity and conductivity, reducing degradation, and supporting high-capacity applications in electric vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

surface oxidation reactions may generate a hydrogen gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface oxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

an average of the measured cohesion strengths ranges from approximately 1 MPa to 20 MPa

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCohesion: Cohesion

Implementation Method 3

a vertical resistance ranges from approximately 0.005Ω to 0.3Ω

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS20250210616A1Negative electrode and lithium secondary battery comprising the same
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
  • US20250210616A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A negative electrode includes a negative electrode active material layer that contains a silicon-based active material, wherein based on a total thickness defined as a distance between opposing first and second surfaces of the negative electrode active material layer, when a cohesion strength is measured respectively at positions corresponding to 25%, 50%, and 75% of the total thickness from the first surface, an average of the measured cohesion strengths ranges from approximately 1 MPa to 20 MPa, a deviation of the measured cohesion strengths is equal to or less than approximately 140%, and a vertical resistance ranges from approximately 0.005Ω to 0.3Ω.