Silicon Hardmask Oxidation by Ion Implantation for Low-Roughness Patterning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional silicon hardmask patterning processes result in line edge roughness (LER) and line width roughness (LWR) due to carbon/(nitride/oxide) hardmask depositions and etchings, necessitating improved methods and equipment.

Innovation Solution

Directly form an oxide hardmask on a silicon mask using ion implantation-enhanced or ion implantation-induced oxidation, bypassing conventional deposition and etching steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional carbon/(nitride/oxide) hardmask deposition and etching processes are used, then a complete hardmask structure can be formed, but line edge roughness (LER) and line width roughness (LWR) increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveline edge roughness and line width roughnessVSAvoidnumber of deposition and etching steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate deposition and etching steps into a single ion implantation process. Instead of sequentially depositing carbon, nitride, and oxide layers followed by multiple etching steps, the invention uses ion implantation to directly form the oxide hardmask pattern in one step, merging several process steps into one unified operation that reduces roughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional thermal or plasma-based deposition and etching mechanisms with ion implantation. Ion implantation uses accelerated ions to directly modify the silicon mask material, substituting the multi-step thermal/chemical processes with a single particle-beam-based process that provides better control and reduced roughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple hardmask deposition and etching steps are performed, then the desired pattern can be achieved, but process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatterning precisionVSAvoidtotal process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent skips the intermediate deposition and etching steps by directly using ion implantation to form the oxide hardmask. This rushes through the conventional multi-step process by jumping directly to the final patterning step, significantly reducing total process time while maintaining or improving patterning precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Solution Approach 2:

The ion implantation process performs the oxidation action preliminarily during the implantation step itself. Rather than depositing material and then etching, the oxygen ions are implanted directly into the silicon mask to form the oxide pattern in advance, eliminating subsequent processing steps and reducing overall time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If conventional hardmask processes are used, then material coverage can be achieved, but material waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial utilization efficiencyVSAvoidmaterial waste from deposition and etching
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The ion implantation process is self-service in that the oxygen ions themselves serve as both the implantation species and the oxidation source. The implanted oxygen directly oxidizes the silicon mask material in situ, eliminating the need for separate oxidation steps and reducing material waste by using the implantation process itself to create the desired oxide structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces LER and LWR by forming an oxide layer within the silicon hardmask opening through controlled ion implantation, improving patterning precision.

Implementation Method 1

forming an oxide layer within the opening by performing an ion implantation process to an upper surface of the silicon mask

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon implantation: Ion Implantation

Implementation Method 2

forming an oxide layer within the opening by performing an ion implantation process to an upper surface of the silicon mask

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS12581884B2Methods for oxidizing a silicon hardmask using ion implant
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US12581884B2 patent drawing
  • US12581884B2 patent drawing
  • US12581884B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of forming a silicon hardmask are disclosed. In one example, a method may include forming a silicon mask over a device layer, forming a carbon mask over the silicon mask, and forming an opening through the carbon mask. The method may further include forming an oxide layer within the opening by performing an ion implantation process to an upper surface of the silicon mask.