Selective Silicon Wafer Texturing via Self-Foaming Etching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional etching processes for silicon wafers in solar cell fabrication often damage the chips and reduce their thickness, especially when using batch-type wet etching methods, which also increase costs due to the need for protective coatings and complex masking processes, and fail to achieve high-efficiency textured surfaces on both sides.

Innovation Solution

An etching composition comprising a base, alcohol, and additive that forms a self-foaming mixture at controlled temperatures, allowing for selective texturing of one surface of a silicon wafer without immersion, thus avoiding the need for protective masks and reducing chip damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If batch-type wet etching process is used to form texture structure on silicon wafer, then etching efficiency is improved, but chip is easily damaged and thickness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching efficiencyVSAvoidchip integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful immersion process from the etching system. Instead of immersing the silicon wafer in etching solution (which causes damage to both surfaces), the invention applies etching solution only to the front surface through spray or dip methods, allowing selective texturing without damaging the rear surface or reducing overall chip thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by applying etching treatment only to the front surface of the silicon wafer where texture structure is needed for light absorption. The rear surface remains untouched and maintains its original properties, enabling separate optimization of front surface texturing and rear surface passivation or metallization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If protection cover is formed and removed in conventional process, then single-surface texturing is achieved, but fabrication cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle-surface texturing qualityVSAvoidfabrication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the protection cover formation and removal steps from the fabrication process. By using selective application methods (spray or dip) that naturally limit etching to the front surface, the need for photoresist masks and protection covers is eliminated, significantly reducing material costs and process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The etching process itself provides the surface selectivity function that previously required separate protection cover steps. The spray or dip application method automatically limits etching to accessible surfaces, making the process self-selective and eliminating the need for additional masking materials and removal steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If entire chip is immersed in etching solution, then etching process is simplified, but thickness is reduced on both surfaces and chip quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching process simplicityVSAvoidchip thickness control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful full-immersion step from the etching process. Instead of immersing the entire chip which etches both surfaces uniformly, the invention uses selective spray or dip application that etches only the front surface, maintaining precise thickness control while achieving the desired texture structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables the formation of an excellent texture structure on a single surface of the silicon wafer with reduced reflectivity, enhancing the conversion efficiency of solar cells while minimizing chip damage and production costs.

Implementation Method 1

the etching composition reacts on the silicon wafer to form a foam that etches the silicon wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFoam formation: Foam

Implementation Method 2

the etching composition reacts on the silicon wafer to form a foam that etches the silicon wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

the additive reacts on the silicon wafer to form oxide that covers the surface of the silicon wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxide formation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 4

etching the silicon wafer at an etching temperature of 60°C to 200°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP2711989B1Etching composition and method for etching a silicon wafer
Publication Date: 2019.11.06 IND TECH RES INST
  • EP2711989B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2711989B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2711989B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An etching composition for a semiconductor wafer is provided, including 0.5-50wt% base, 10-80wt% alcohol, 0.01-15wt% additive and water. A method for etching a semiconductor wafer is also provided. When the etching composition is applied to the entire surface or a partial surface of the semiconductor wafer at 60-200°C, the etching composition reacts on the semiconductor wafer to form a foam that etches the semiconductor wafer and includes a solid, a liquid and a gas. At the same time, the additive forms an oxide mask on the surface of the semiconductor wafer. Therefore, an excellent texture structure is formed on the surface of the semiconductor wafer, and only a single surface of the semiconductor wafer is etched.