Siloxane Preparation Using Cationic Silicon(II) Catalysts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for preparing siloxanes from organosilicon compounds with silicon-hydrogen and alkoxy moieties are hindered by the formation of mixed products, catalyst deactivation, and safety risks due to exothermic reactions, leading to complex process control and high costs.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the reaction of silanes or siloxanes with a cationic silicon(II) compound, specifically [Si(II)Cp]+, at elevated temperatures to form Si—O—Si bonds, simplifying process control and avoiding catalyst excess, thereby enhancing reaction reproducibility and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If B(C6F5)3 catalyst is used for the reaction, then the reaction can proceed, but the catalyst is consumed during the reaction leading to deactivation and process control complications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst stabilityVSAvoidprocess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a stoichiometric amount of a cheap, easily replaceable catalyst (such as organometallic compounds like Cp2ZrCl2 or simple metal halides) instead of an expensive, stable catalyst that requires complex control. The catalyst is used in controlled amounts and can be replaced if needed, simplifying process control while maintaining reaction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the catalyst system from a stable organic catalyst (B(C6F5)3) to a different class of catalysts with different stability and reactivity characteristics. By using catalysts that operate under different mechanistic conditions (e.g., zirconium-based or simple metal halide catalysts), the reaction proceeds without catalyst deactivation issues, eliminating the need for complex process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If large amounts of catalyst are added at the start of the reaction, then catalyst deactivation is compensated, but the reaction becomes unsafe due to exothermicity and rapid initial phase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidsafety risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a large excess of catalyst to compensate for deactivation, the patent uses a precise stoichiometric or sub-stoichiometric amount of catalyst that is sufficient for the reaction to proceed to completion. This controlled amount prevents the rapid exothermic initial phase that occurs with large catalyst amounts, eliminating safety risks while maintaining high conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a catalyst system where a controlled, limited amount of catalyst is used and does not deactivate during the reaction. This eliminates the need to add large amounts of catalyst, thereby preventing the exothermic runaway that would occur with excessive catalyst loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Manufacturing precision

If silanols are used for condensation, then siloxane moieties can be formed, but the method leads to mixture of hetero- and homocondensation products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct uniformityVSAvoidsynthetic route complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the problematic water byproduct from the reaction system by using alkoxy silanes instead of silanols. The reaction proceeds via elimination of alcohol instead of water, preventing water from attacking siloxane moieties and causing equilibration. This selective approach eliminates hetero- and homocondensation mixtures while maintaining synthetic simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reaction parameters by using alkoxy silanes (Si-OR) instead of silanols (Si-OH) as reactants. This fundamental change in the functional group leads to elimination of different byproducts (alcohol instead of water) and prevents the formation of mixed condensation products, achieving high product uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If water is formed during silanol condensation, then siloxane moieties are formed, but water attacks further siloxane moieties leading to equilibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct selectivityVSAvoidwater attack on siloxane
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of water formation into a beneficial outcome by using alkoxy silanes that eliminate alcohol instead of water. The alcohol byproduct is less reactive and does not attack siloxane moieties, preventing equilibration. This approach maintains high product selectivity while eliminating the harmful water attack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reaction chemistry from water-eliminating condensation to alcohol-eliminating condensation. By using alkoxy silanes as reactants, the byproduct changes from water (which attacks siloxanes) to alcohol (which does not attack siloxanes), thereby preventing equilibration and maintaining product selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the formation of siloxane moieties without the drawbacks of previous methods, simplifying process control and increasing reaction reproducibility while minimizing catalyst consumption and associated costs.

Implementation Method 1

a compound A is reacted with a compound B or a compound A is reacted with a compound C or a compound B is reacted with a compound C or a compound C is reacted without compound A and B in the presence of a compound D at at least 40° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS11325923B2Preparation of siloxanes in the presence of cationic silicon (II) compounds
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 WACKER CHEMIE AG
  • US11325923B2 patent drawing
  • US11325923B2 patent drawing
  • US11325923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Siloxanes are prepared by reacting:a compound A with a compound B ora compound A with a compound C ora compound B with a compound C ora compound C alone,in the presence of a compound D at ≥40° C., wherein compound A is a silane or a siloxane having at least one silicon-bonded hydrogen atom,compound B is a silane or a siloxane having at least one silicon-bonded alkoxy moiety,compound C is a silane or a siloxane having at least one silicon-bonded hydrogen atom and at least one silicon-bonded alkoxy moiety, andcompound D is a cationic Si(II) compound.