Amphiphilic Siloxane Polyurethane Coating for Marine Biofouling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing marine coatings struggle with biofouling, particularly during idle periods, as they fail to effectively inhibit the settlement of marine organisms, leading to increased frictional drag and fuel consumption, and current non-toxic solutions like PDMS and PEG-based coatings have limitations in protein resistance and fouling release properties.

Innovation Solution

A curable amphiphilic siloxane polyurethane coating composition is developed, incorporating hydrophilically modified polyisocyanates with PEG and sulfobetaine groups, combined with PDMS, to create a coating that enhances protein resistance and fouling release properties through a highly hydrated surface layer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If PDMS based fouling-release coatings are used, then fouling release behavior is improved at higher ship speeds, but settlement of fouling during idle periods increases leading to decreased performance over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefouling release behaviorVSAvoididle period settlement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The coating applies preliminary action by incorporating hydrophilic groups (PEG, sulfobetaine) that actively inhibit protein adsorption and microfouling settlement during idle periods before the ship departs. This preventive mechanism ensures the surface remains fouling-resistant during static periods, addressing the settlement issue that plagues conventional PDMS coatings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite materials by combining PDMS elastomers with hydrophilic modifiers (PEG and sulfobetaine groups) to create an amphiphilic coating system. This composite structure integrates the low surface energy properties of PDMS for fouling release with the protein resistance properties of hydrophilic groups, resolving the contradiction between speed-dependent release and idle-period settlement resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If PEG modified surfaces are used for protein resistance, then protein adsorption is minimized through hydrophilic interactions, but the coating complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotein adsorptionVSAvoidcoating formulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges multiple hydrophilic functional groups (PEG and sulfobetaine) into a single integrated coating formulation. This combination approach consolidates protein resistance mechanisms while maintaining manageable formulation complexity, as both groups work synergistically to inhibit protein adsorption through different but complementary hydrophilic interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies parameter changes by modifying the chemical composition of the coating to include specific ratios of PEG and sulfobetaine groups. By optimizing these compositional parameters, the coating achieves enhanced protein resistance without excessive complexity, as the parameter optimization allows for systematic formulation development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If hydrophilic groups are incorporated to enhance protein resistance, then fouling inhibition during idle periods is improved, but the coating formulation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefouling inhibitionVSAvoidformulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses parameter changes by optimizing the concentration and type of hydrophilic groups (PEG and sulfobetaine) in the coating formulation. By systematically varying these compositional parameters, the coating achieves effective fouling inhibition during idle periods while maintaining formulation complexity at acceptable levels through data-driven optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If conventional antifouling coatings are used, then biofouling control is achieved, but environmental toxicity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiofouling controlVSAvoidenvironmental toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the previously harmful approach of using toxic biocides into a beneficial non-toxic mechanism. By replacing toxic substance release with a physical-chemical mechanism based on low surface energy and protein resistance, the coating achieves effective biofouling control without environmental toxicity, turning the paradigm from harmful chemical action to beneficial physical protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the chemical-mechanical system of toxic biocide release with a physical mechanism based on surface energy modulation and hydrophilic interactions. This substitution eliminates environmental toxicity while maintaining biofouling control through the amphiphilic coating's ability to resist protein adsorption and microfouling settlement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The coating effectively reduces marine biofouling by minimizing organism attachment and facilitating easy removal, demonstrating superior fouling release performance and mechanical durability compared to commercial standards.

Implementation Method 1

PEG chains on the surface can bind water molecules through hydrogen bonding, creating a highly hydrated water layer minimizing the interfacial surface energy.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogen bonding:

Implementation Method 2

creating a highly hydrated water layer minimizing the interfacial surface energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydration:

Implementation Method 3

protein resistant materials are being widely explored for non-toxic marine coatings to delay the settlement of fouling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProtein resistance:

Implementation Method 4

PEG-modified surfaces display protein resistance properties due to hydrophilic interactions with water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophilic interactions:

Data Source

PatentUS12466977B2Amphiphilic siloxane polyurethane coating compositions and methods of making and using thereof
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV RES FOUND
  • US12466977B2 patent drawing
  • US12466977B2 patent drawing
  • US12466977B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a curable amphiphilic siloxane polyurethane coating composition. The invention also relates to methods of making and using the curable amphiphilic siloxane polyurethane coating composition of the invention. The invention also relates to methods for reducing or preventing biofouling of a surface exposed to an aqueous environment comprising the use of the curable amphiphilic siloxane polyurethane coating composition of the invention.