Siloxane Synthesis via Cationic Silicon(II) Catalysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing siloxanes from hydridosilicon compounds and carbonyl compounds are inefficient due to the formation of flammable gases, high catalyst requirements, and instability issues caused by residual acid, making the processes costly and unreliable.

Innovation Solution

A process using cationic silicon(II), germanium(II), and/or tin(II) compounds to catalyze the reaction between hydridosilicon compounds and carbonyl compounds, which avoids the formation of gaseous products and reduces catalyst usage, allowing for the selective and rapid formation of siloxanes under neutral and aprotic conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the Piers-Rubinsztajn reaction uses alkoxysilanes (Si-OR) with methyl or ethyl groups, then the reaction can proceed under neutral and aprotic conditions avoiding acid instability, but highly flammable gases such as ethane or methane are formed requiring increased process safety measures and significantly increasing process costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct stabilityVSAvoidflammable gas formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the reactant parameters by replacing alkoxysilanes with carbonyl compounds (aldehydes or ketones) as the oxygen source. This parameter change eliminates the formation of flammable hydrocarbon gases while maintaining the benefits of neutral reaction conditions and product stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the potentially harmful reaction between Si-H and Si-OR that produces flammable gases into a beneficial reaction between Si-H and carbonyl compounds that produces non-flammable siloxanes and hydrocarbons, thereby eliminating safety hazards while maintaining reaction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Ease of manufacture

If Marks et al. use supported dioxo-molybdenum catalyst for ether formation from carbonyl compounds and dimethylphenylsilane, then the reaction can proceed, but the reaction temperature must be 100 °C and ketones react significantly more slowly than aldehydes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction feasibilityVSAvoidreaction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the catalyst parameter from supported dioxo-molybdenum to cationic silicon(II), germanium(II), and/or tin(II) compounds. This catalyst change enables the reaction to proceed at lower temperatures with improved rates for both aldehydes and ketones, eliminating the significant rate difference between these carbonyl compound types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces cationic silicon(II), germanium(II), and/or tin(II) compounds as intermediary catalysts that facilitate the reaction between hydridosilicon compounds and carbonyl compounds, providing a more effective catalytic pathway that overcomes the limitations of previous catalyst systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If Hudnall et al. use cationic antimony(V) compound as catalyst for ether formation, then ethers are formed with high selectivity, but the catalyst content is high making the process uneconomical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveether selectivityVSAvoidprocess economy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the catalyst parameter from cationic antimony(V) compounds to cationic silicon(II), germanium(II), and/or tin(II) compounds. This catalyst substitution maintains high selectivity for siloxane formation while dramatically reducing the catalyst content required, thereby improving process economy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs catalysts (silicon(II), germanium(II), and/or tin(II) compounds) that are more cost-effective than antimony(V) compounds, allowing for economical process operation even at low catalyst loadings while maintaining high product selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Productivity

If the hydrolytic condensation of chlorosilanes is used for siloxane production, then large-scale production is achieved, but complete separation and recycling of hydrogen chloride requires considerable technical effort and traces of acid reduce product stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction scaleVSAvoidseparation and recycling system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates an inert reaction environment by using neutral and aprotic conditions with cationic silicon(II), germanium(II), and/or tin(II) catalysts. This eliminates the formation of acidic byproducts like hydrogen chloride, thereby simplifying the process by removing the need for complex separation and recycling systems while maintaining large-scale production capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process achieves high yields of siloxanes with a wide variety of carbonyl compounds, eliminating the need for costly gas handling and reducing catalyst costs, resulting in a more economical and reliable production method.

Implementation Method 1

siloxanes can be formed from hydridosilicon compounds and carbonyl compounds in the presence of cationic silicon(II), germanium(II), and/or tin(II) compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentEP4041804B1Process for preparing siloxanes from hydridosilicon compounds
Publication Date: 2023.07.05 WACKER CHEMIE AG
  • EP4041804B1 patent drawing
  • EP4041804B1 patent drawing
  • EP4041804B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for preparing siloxanes, wherein (a) at least one hydridosilicon compound selected from (a1) compounds of general formula (I); and/or from (a2) compounds of general formula (I'); and (b) at least one carbonyl compound selected from (b1) compounds of general formula (II); and/or from (b2) compounds of general formula (II'); and (c) at least one cationic compound of general formula (III) are brought into contact and are reacted with one another.