Silver-Modified Zeolite Adsorbent for Mercury Removal in Oxygenated Hydrocarbon Streams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mercury removal technologies, particularly adsorbents like mixed metal oxides, are ineffective in the presence of oxygen, which is introduced by hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, leading to corrosion issues and hazardous waste disposal problems in hydrocarbon streams.

Innovation Solution

Silver-containing zeolites are used as regenerable adsorbents that maintain effectiveness in removing mercury from hydrocarbon streams containing oxygen, with silver being stable in the presence of air and allowing for efficient mercury amalgamation and recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mixed metal oxide adsorbents are used for mercury removal, then mercury can be removed from hydrocarbon streams, but the adsorbents become ineffective in the presence of oxygen and produce hazardous waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury removal effectivenessVSAvoidperformance in presence of oxygen
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the adsorbent by incorporating silver (0.1-10 wt%) and sulfur (1-20 wt%) into the mixed metal oxide structure. This compositional modification enables the adsorbent to maintain mercury removal effectiveness while becoming resistant to oxygen deactivation, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite adsorbent material combining mixed metal oxides with silver and sulfur components. This composite structure synergistically integrates the mercury affinity of mixed metal oxides with the oxygen stability provided by silver-sulfur complexes, allowing simultaneous achievement of high mercury removal performance and oxygen environment adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If non-regenerable adsorbents are used, then mercury removal is achieved, but hazardous waste disposal problems arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury removal capabilityVSAvoidhazardous waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a regeneration system where spent adsorbent is thermally treated to desorb accumulated mercury, restoring the adsorbent's activity. The desorbed mercury is recovered as a separate stream, allowing the adsorbent to be reused multiple times and eliminating hazardous waste generation while maintaining continuous mercury removal capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If activated carbon with mercury reactive materials is used, then mercury removal is effective, but the process becomes complex and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury removal efficiencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a single integrated composite adsorbent containing mixed metal oxides, silver, and sulfur that provides inherent mercury removal capability without requiring separate reactive material impregnation steps. This simplifies the overall process architecture compared to traditional activated carbon systems while maintaining high removal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of silver-containing zeolites enables effective mercury removal and recovery from hydrocarbon streams with oxygen, preventing corrosion and reducing hazardous waste, while maintaining process efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The purification processes are most often based on adsorption technology where the mercury is selectively adsorbed on to the adsorbent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

silver being stable in the presence of air and allowing for efficient mercury amalgamation and recovery

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAmalgamation:

Data Source

PatentUS9670422B2Process for the removal of mercury from hydrocarbon streams containing oxygen
Publication Date: 2017.06.06 UOP LLC
  • US9670422B2 patent drawing
  • US9670422B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for removing and recovering mercury, an impurity, from a hydrocarbon feedstream containing oxygen, such as introduced during hydraulic fracturing. Mercury is selectively removed to very low levels of concentration from fluid streams such as natural gas, cracked gas, hydrogen or naphtha by passage of the stream through an adsorbent bed containing particles of a zeolitic molecular sieve preferably having pore diameters of at least 3.0 angstroms and in which the zeolite crystallites are formed into an aggregate (cylindrical or beads) which contain ionic or elemental silver. These adsorbent particles maintain their capacity for removal of mercury despite the presence of oxygen.