SIMD SM4 Cryptographic Logic for High-Throughput Encryption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies face challenges in efficiently implementing the SM4 cryptographic block cipher, particularly in terms of performance and circuit area, especially when compared to software implementations.

Innovation Solution

The development of instructions and logic for a Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) SM4 round slice operation, which allows for simultaneous execution of SM4-round exchanges and key generations using the same SIMD instruction, enabling concurrent processing of encryption or decryption with key expansion in a small buffer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If software implementation of SM4 is used, then flexibility and ease of implementation are improved, but processing performance deteriorates significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidprocessing performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces software-based cryptographic processing with dedicated hardware logic circuits that implement SM4 encryption/decryption functions. This substitution of mechanical/software systems with hardware systems resolves the contradiction by providing both the ease of implementation through standardized logic blocks and high processing performance through parallel hardware execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the SM4 cryptographic algorithm into multiple independent round functions (typically 32 rounds) that can be executed in parallel. Each round processes different data blocks simultaneously using separate logic paths, thereby achieving high throughput while maintaining the structured ease of implementation through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If straightforward hardware implementations using lookup memories or truth tables are used, then encryption speed is improved, but circuit area increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencryption speedVSAvoidcircuit area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the cryptographic computation from table-lookup operations to algebraic operations in Galois Fields (GF(2^8)). By changing the computational parameters from memory-based lookup to field-based arithmetic (multiplication, inversion, addition), the implementation achieves high encryption speed through efficient hardware arithmetic while reducing circuit area by eliminating large lookup tables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces memory-based lookup mechanisms with arithmetic computation logic operating in Galois Fields. This substitution eliminates the need for large lookup memories or truth tables, thereby maintaining high encryption speed through efficient arithmetic operations while significantly reducing the circuit area required for implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Area of stationary object

If finite field approaches isomorphic to GF(256) are used, then circuit area is reduced, but processing speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit areaVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the finite field operations into parallel processing paths, where multiple round functions operate simultaneously on different data blocks. This segmentation maintains the area efficiency of finite field approaches while restoring processing speed through parallel execution, allowing the system to achieve both compact circuit area and high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic parallelism by allowing multiple finite field operation units to execute concurrently, with each unit processing different portions of the cryptographic data. This dynamic approach maintains the area efficiency of compact finite field logic while achieving high processing speeds through simultaneous execution of multiple operational instances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12323515B2Instructions and logic to provide SIMD SM4 cryptographic block cipher functionality
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 INTEL CORP
  • US12323515B2 patent drawing
  • US12323515B2 patent drawing
  • US12323515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Instructions and logic provide for a Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) SM4 round slice operation. Embodiments of an instruction specify a first and a second source data operand set, and substitution function indicators, e.g. in an immediate operand. Embodiments of a processor may include encryption units, responsive to the first instruction, to: perform a slice of SM4-round exchanges on a portion of the first source data operand set with a corresponding keys from the second source data operand set in response to a substitution function indicator that indicates a first substitution function, perform a slice of SM4 key generations using another portion of the first source data operand set with corresponding constants from the second source data operand set in response to a substitution function indicator that indicates a second substitution function, and store a set of result elements of the first instruction in a SIMD destination register.