Simplified Mesh Network Protocol for IoT Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless mesh network protocols for IoT devices are complex and power-intensive, requiring high computational resources and bandwidth, which is not suitable for small-scale, battery-operated devices with limited memory and computing power.

Innovation Solution

A simplified mesh network protocol that modifies the IEEE 802.11 standard by changing addresses in data frames to reduce computational overhead and power consumption, allowing IoT devices to operate efficiently with reduced complexity and resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional IEEE 802.11 mesh network protocols are used, then network capacity and bandwidth are improved, but power consumption and protocol complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork bandwidthVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mesh network into hierarchical levels (root node, intermediate nodes, leaf nodes) with simplified protocols for each level. IoT devices at leaf nodes use a simplified protocol for basic operations, while only intermediate and root nodes handle complex mesh routing functions. This segmentation allows bandwidth-intensive operations to be concentrated at higher levels while leaf nodes consume less power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key protocol parameters for IoT devices, including using simplified address formats (reducing from 4 address fields to essential fields only), disabling optional 802.11 features, and modifying frame structures. These parameter changes reduce computational overhead and power consumption while maintaining essential network functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If conventional IEEE 802.11 mesh network protocols are used, then network capacity and bandwidth are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidprotocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the mesh network into hierarchical levels where IoT devices (leaf nodes) use a simplified protocol subset, while intermediate and root nodes handle complex routing. This segmentation allows high network capacity through full mesh capabilities at intermediate nodes while keeping IoT device complexity low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes complex 802.11 mesh protocol features that are unnecessary for IoT devices, keeping only essential functions for basic data transmission. This extraction reduces device complexity while maintaining sufficient network capacity through the simplified protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If full IEEE 802.11 address fields are used in data frames, then routing flexibility and network adaptability are improved, but computational overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting flexibilityVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes address field parameters by using simplified address formats with fewer fields compared to full IEEE 802.11. This reduction decreases computational overhead for address processing while maintaining sufficient routing flexibility through the simplified address structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Speed

If high bandwidth operations are implemented, then data transmission speed is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments bandwidth-intensive operations to be performed primarily at intermediate and root nodes rather than at every IoT device. Leaf nodes use simplified transmission protocols, while complex high-speed data handling is concentrated at higher network levels, reducing overall power consumption while maintaining data transmission speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3259938B1Simple mesh network for wireless transceivers
Publication Date: 2021.06.30 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • EP3259938B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP3259938B1 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP3259938B1 patent drawingFigure 3~7

AI summary

In described examples, a method of operating a node of a network includes receiving a data frame (500) having a header with multiple addresses. The node determines if a first address of the multiple addresses is an address of a descendant (506) of the node and if a second address of the multiple addresses is a parent address (502) of the node. If so, the node changes a second address of the multiple addresses to its own address (512) in response to the determining. The node then transmits the data frame (514) to at least one descendant of the node.