Neural-Network Simulated Quantum Annealing for Hardware-Limited Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum computing devices face hardware limitations that hinder their ability to efficiently solve complex optimization problems, and existing classical algorithms struggle to explore the solution space effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method is employed that simulates quantum annealing principles, such as tunneling and superposition, using artificial neural networks and quantum-inspired algorithms on classical computers to enhance the exploration and exploitation of optimization landscapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If quantum annealing is implemented on current quantum devices, then quantum tunneling and superposition effects are utilized to explore optimization landscapes, but hardware limitations prevent efficient solution of complex optimization problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution qualityVSAvoidhardware limitations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simulated quantum annealing system that copies quantum behaviors (tunneling and superposition effects) using classical computing components. Instead of requiring actual quantum hardware, the invention implements quantum-like dynamics through simulated quantum states and operators, allowing complex optimization problems to be solved without being constrained by current quantum device hardware limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the physical quantum mechanical system with a simulated computational system. Quantum tunneling is simulated through probabilistic transitions in the energy landscape, and superposition is represented through simultaneous exploration of multiple states in the simulation, substituting actual quantum mechanics with computational analogs that achieve similar optimization effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional classical optimization methods are used, then hardware limitations are avoided, but the ability to explore solution space and avoid local minima is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution exploration capabilityVSAvoidoptimization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of classical optimization by introducing quantum-inspired dynamics. The system uses simulated quantum tunneling to enable transitions between energy states that would be inaccessible through classical thermal fluctuations alone, and employs simulated superposition to simultaneously evaluate multiple solution paths, thereby enhancing both exploration capability and optimization efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic quantum-like behavior to the optimization process. The simulated quantum system evolves through time-dependent Hamiltonians that control the annealing schedule, allowing the system to adaptively explore the energy landscape with quantum-inspired dynamics rather than static classical optimization rules, improving both versatility and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for higher-quality solutions to complex optimization problems by leveraging the synergy between quantum-inspired techniques and neural networks, overcoming hardware limitations of current quantum devices.

Implementation Method 1

Quantum annealing utilizes principles of quantum mechanics, such as tunneling and superposition, to explore the energy landscape of optimization problems

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum tunneling:

Implementation Method 2

the quantum optimization Hamiltonian comprises the objective function represented as a classical Hamiltonian and a non-commutating driving term causing quantum fluctuations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum fluctuations:

Data Source

PatentUS20250307341A1System and method for simulated quantum annealing to solve optimization problems
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 YIYANIQ INC
  • US20250307341A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307341A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307341A1 patent drawing

AI summary

System and method for simulated quantum annealing to solve optimization problems. The method comprises performing simulated quantum annealing by: generating quantum annealing simulations of an objective function that represents an optimization problem by initializing a guiding wave function with a variational ansatz, wherein the guiding wave function represents a ground state wave function of a quantum optimization Hamiltonian that the objective function represented as a classical Hamiltonian and a non-commutating driving term causing quantum fluctuations; stochastically evolving the quantum annealing simulations under a time-dependent driving schedule according to an imaginary-time Schrödinger equation supplemented by the guiding wave function until a predetermined condition is met; and outputting a plurality of output states responsive to the predetermined condition being met, each output state representing a solution to the optimization problem of the application-specific parameters within the application-specific constraints.