Simulated Caller Dialog System for Objective CSR Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human-based training and evaluation of customer service representatives (CSRs) are subjective, inconsistent, and costly, lacking objective measures for soft skills like empathy and understanding, and require trainer availability.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system generating simulated caller dialog scenarios for CSRs, using intent determination, facial emotional recognition, and keyword analysis to objectively assess responses, providing feedback and scoring based on machine learning models, and recording scores in a database.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human-based training and evaluation is used, then personal guidance and empathy assessment are provided, but subjectivity and inconsistency in evaluation results occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation consistencyVSAvoidmanual evaluation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates simulated caller copies that replicate real customer interactions, allowing CSRs to practice and be evaluated in realistic scenarios without actual customers. The simulated callers include pre-recorded dialogues with various issues, enabling consistent and repeatable evaluation scenarios across different CSRs and training sessions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical human evaluation process with an automated system that uses speech recognition, natural language processing, and machine learning algorithms to objectively assess CSR responses. This substitution eliminates human subjectivity while maintaining evaluation capability through computational analysis of CSR interactions with simulated callers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If human trainers are used for training and evaluation, then personalized feedback is provided, but high costs and time consumption are incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidtrainer resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The automated evaluation system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it evaluates intent understanding, assesses empathy through facial expression analysis, provides real-time feedback, and tracks performance metrics. This multi-functional system replaces multiple human trainers who would otherwise be needed for different aspects of CSR evaluation, improving productivity while reducing resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables CSRs to self-evaluate and self-improve through automated feedback mechanisms. The system provides immediate performance metrics and guidance without requiring constant human trainer intervention, allowing CSRs to independently practice and refine their skills during training sessions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If human trainers are required for evaluation, then real-time human feedback is available, but trainer availability constraints limit on-demand training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveon-demand training accessVSAvoidautomated evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the need for human trainer availability with an automated system that operates continuously without interruption. The system uses computer vision for facial expression analysis, speech recognition for dialogue understanding, and machine learning models for real-time evaluation, enabling CSRs to access training and evaluation at any time without scheduling constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces simulated callers as intermediaries between CSRs and actual customers, allowing evaluation to proceed without requiring human trainers as intermediaries. These simulated callers handle the interaction layer, while the automated backend systems provide the evaluation and feedback functions that would otherwise require human trainers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12107995B2Objective training and evaluation
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 CVS PHARMACY INC
  • US12107995B2 patent drawing
  • US12107995B2 patent drawing
  • US12107995B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method configured to generate a simulated caller dialog including a caller intended issue for a scenario for testing a customer service representative (CSR). A simulated caller dialog is presented to the CSR and a CSR response to the simulated caller dialog is received and includes a CSR interpretation of the caller intended issue to the simulated caller dialog. An understanding determination result based on an intent determination recognition score is generated by an intent determination recognition model is generated in response to a comparison of the CSR interpretation of the caller intended issue matching the caller intended issue in the simulated caller dialog. A CSR score is generated for the scenario based on the understanding determination result. The CSR score is recorded to a database.