Simulated Collision Severity Classification for Autonomous Vehicle Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing self-driving car simulators lack a standardized and efficient method for accurately classifying the severity of simulated collisions, leading to subjective and inconsistent results, which hinders the improvement and validation of autonomous vehicle navigation algorithms.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system that automatically detects collisions in simulated scenarios, generates collision impact scores based on intersection analysis, and classifies severity using compression and shear impact scores, accounting for various collision types and angles, to provide standardized and efficient collision severity assessments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If engineers manually analyze simulated collisions using subjective methods, then flexibility in studying different scenarios is maintained, but measurement precision and consistency of collision severity classification deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision severity classification accuracyVSAvoidautomated detection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The collision analysis is segmented into distinct components: collision detection, impact score generation, and severity classification. Each component processes specific aspects of the collision independently, allowing for precise measurement while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms subjective collision analysis into objective parameter-based assessment by calculating impact scores based on measurable parameters such as intersection area, collision force, and vehicle dynamics. This parameterization enables consistent severity classification across different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If standardized automated collision detection is implemented, then measurement precision and efficiency are improved, but the ability to handle diverse collision scenarios adaptively may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision analysis efficiencyVSAvoidscenario flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The automated detection system is designed with universal applicability to handle multiple collision scenarios including head-on collisions, side impacts, rear-end collisions, and pedestrian accidents. The impact score calculation methodology adapts to different vehicle types and collision geometries, maintaining both efficiency and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its analysis based on the specific collision scenario detected. The impact score generation process adapts to different collision types, vehicle configurations, and environmental conditions, allowing the standardized system to remain flexible across diverse situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If multiple impact scores are calculated for different collision types, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact severity measurement accuracyVSAvoidimpact score calculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impact assessment is segmented into multiple independent impact scores, each evaluating a specific aspect of the collision (e.g., compression impact, shear impact, lateral impact). This segmentation allows for precise measurement of different collision dimensions while keeping each individual calculation relatively simple and computationally efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12566900B2Systems, methods, and computer program products for severity classifications of simulated collisions
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12566900B2 patent drawing
  • US12566900B2 patent drawing
  • US12566900B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are systems, methods, and computer program products for severity classification of simulated collisions in self-driving systems of simulated environments, comprising controlling a simulated autonomous vehicle (AV) in a road during a plurality of simulated driving scenarios involving a road actor, automatically detecting a collision based on an intersection between affected portions of a simulated AV and affected portions the road actor, generating a plurality of collision impact scores, wherein each impact score of the plurality of collision impact scores signals a severity of a different impact type of collision, and classifying the severity of the collision based on the plurality of collision impact scores for the affected portion of the simulated AV and road actor.