Simulated Driving Scenario Evaluation Using Real-World Vehicle Events

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an effective method to assess and improve the driving performance of vehicle operators, particularly in simulated driving scenarios, which are essential for both human and autonomous driving algorithms, as they fail to accurately mimic real-life driving situations and provide actionable feedback.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a network of vehicles equipped with sensors and processors to detect vehicle events, generate simulation scenarios based on real-life driving situations, and assess operator performance through simulated driving experiences, allowing for the creation of simulation scenarios that mimic real-life events and provide metrics on operator performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If simulation scenarios are created based on real-life driving situations, then the realism and applicability of simulations is improved, but the complexity of data collection and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverealism of simulation scenariosVSAvoidcomplexity of data collection system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a standardized data collection framework that serves multiple purposes: collecting sensor data for scenario generation, storing data for future simulations, and providing data for performance analysis. This multi-functional approach reduces overall system complexity while improving simulation realism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and stores raw sensor data from real-life driving situations in a structured format before simulation scenarios are needed. This preliminary data preparation reduces the complexity of real-time scenario generation and improves the reliability of simulations when they are executed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple vehicle events are detected and simulated, then the comprehensiveness of performance assessment is improved, but the time required for simulation and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of performance assessmentVSAvoidsimulation and analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system executes simulations in periodic batches, where multiple vehicle events are simulated in structured cycles. This allows comprehensive performance assessment across multiple scenarios while managing time consumption through efficient batch processing and prioritization of critical events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The performance assessment is divided into separate metrics for different vehicle events (safety, efficiency, comfort, etc.). This segmentation allows the system to provide comprehensive assessment across multiple dimensions while enabling selective analysis of specific event types, reducing overall analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If detailed metrics are collected for operator performance, then the accuracy of performance evaluation is improved, but the complexity of data processing and feedback generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of performance evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant performance metrics from the collected data, such as reaction time, braking distance, and lane-keeping accuracy. This selective extraction maintains high evaluation accuracy while significantly reducing the complexity of data processing and feedback generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms that directly map detailed metrics to actionable performance evaluations. This feedback loop structures the complex data into meaningful insights, maintaining measurement precision while reducing processing complexity through systematic evaluation criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240274028A1Systems and methods for comparing driving performance for simulated driving
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 SMARTDRIVE SYSTEMS INC
  • US20240274028A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274028A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274028A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to a system that determines driving performance by a vehicle operator for simulated driving of a simulated vehicle in a simulation engine. Individual vehicle event scenarios correspond to vehicle events. Individual simulation scenarios correspond to individual vehicle event scenarios. A vehicle operator, e.g., an autonomous driving algorithm, operates the simulated vehicle in the simulation engine for a set of simulation scenarios. One or more metrics quantify the performance of the vehicle operator based on simulated results.