Simulation Interface Segmentation for Injection Molding Setup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current simulation software for injection molding and metal casting processes is complex, requiring numerous parameters to be set, which can be overwhelming for users, leading to inefficiencies in the setup process and increased time spent on parameter configuration rather than simulation performance.

Innovation Solution

A user interface with multiple inter-linked views provides a graphical overview of the process, allowing asynchronous amendments and intuitive control of simulation parameters, enabling users to easily set up and modify parameters across different views linked to the process steps and components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If advanced simulation software is used to guide users through the setup process with many parameters, then simulation accuracy and completeness are improved, but user interface complexity and difficulty of operation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation setup accuracyVSAvoiduser interface usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface is segmented into multiple independent views (process view, component view, material view, results view) that can be accessed and modified separately. Each view presents a specific aspect of the simulation setup, allowing users to work with manageable portions of parameters rather than overwhelming comprehensive forms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interface transitions from traditional linear parameter forms to a multi-dimensional view-based system. Users can navigate through different dimensional perspectives (process steps, components, materials) of the same simulation setup, enabling intuitive exploration and modification of parameters from various angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If comprehensive parameter setup is required for accurate simulation, then simulation reliability is improved, but setup time and user effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation reliabilityVSAvoidparameter setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Default parameter values and process configurations are pre-configured in the system based on industry standards and typical requirements. When users start a new simulation, these preliminary settings are automatically applied, providing a reliable baseline that can be quickly reviewed and adjusted rather than requiring complete manual setup from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to users about parameter completeness, consistency, and potential issues throughout the setup process. Validation messages, warnings, and suggestions guide users toward complete and accurate parameter configuration without requiring them to manually verify every parameter, reducing both time and effort while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2448696B1Simulation of a process
Publication Date: 2020.02.12 MAGMA GIESSEREITECH
  • EP2448696B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2448696B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b
  • EP2448696B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An apparatus for simulating a casting or molding process, said apparatus comprising means for providing a computer model (322) of at least one component (335), means for displaying said computer model (322), means for receiving an input indicating a component (324, 326, 328, 335) and in response thereto update said component, means for displaying at least one process step object (378) for the process, said process step object being associated with a process parameter, means for receiving an input indicating a process step object (378) and in response thereto update said parameter and means for performing a simulation of said process on the at least one component (335), simulating each process step according the process step object's (378) associated parameters and an event time. It is suggested that Figure 3 is published with the abstract.