Mechanical Structure Simulation Tuning Using Non-Contact Vibration Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for adapting numerical simulations of mechanical structures using vibration measurements face challenges in accurately determining the free parameters of the Finite Element Analytical Model (FEA) due to limited accessibility of the structural surface, material properties that are difficult to measure, and errors in optimizing these parameters, especially for materials with high damping and noise.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a non-contact measuring device to optimize the free elasticity and damping parameters of a physical model by calculating elasticity and damping metrics from vibration waveforms, decomposing waveforms into standing and propagating components, and iteratively adjusting parameters based on error measures, without requiring detailed physical model information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If modal analysis with MAC measure is used to optimize FEA parameters, then parameter optimization can be performed, but errors occur when measurement surface is limited and modes cannot be properly paired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization accuracyVSAvoidmode pairing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary vibration data from the limited measurement surface and uses wavelet transforms to extract local vibration characteristics. By focusing on local wavelet coefficients rather than requiring complete global mode information, the method overcomes the limitation of restricted measurement access while maintaining optimization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces wavelet transforms as an intermediary tool that bridges the gap between limited measurement data and complete structural parameter identification. The wavelet coefficients serve as intermediate representations that capture essential vibration characteristics without requiring full mode shape information, enabling accurate parameter optimization despite measurement constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If laser vibration scanner is used for non-contact measurement, then contactless vibration data can be obtained, but measurement is limited to optically accessible surfaces only

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-contact measurement capabilityVSAvoidmeasurement surface coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality analysis by using wavelet transforms to extract local vibration characteristics from the measurable surface. Instead of requiring complete global coverage, the method focuses on capturing local wavelet coefficients that represent the essential vibration behavior, allowing accurate parameter identification even when only a portion of the structure is accessible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If FRF method is used to optimize FEA matrices, then modal analysis can be avoided, but significant errors occur when interpolated data covers wide area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement procedure simplicityVSAvoidoptimization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using wavelet transforms to extract only the essential local vibration characteristics needed for parameter optimization, rather than requiring complete frequency response functions across the entire structure. This selective extraction of necessary information maintains accuracy while avoiding the interpolation errors that plague FRF methods over wide areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If iterative optimization is performed to minimize error between simulated and measured waveforms, then parameter accuracy is improved, but convergence time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter accuracyVSAvoidconvergence time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using wavelet transforms to pre-process the measured vibration data and extract local characteristics before the iterative optimization begins. This preliminary extraction of essential features provides a better initial foundation for the optimization algorithm, reducing the number of iterations needed to converge while maintaining high parameter accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for accurate optimization of elasticity and damping parameters across a wide frequency range, applicable to various materials and structures, reducing errors and convergence time, and enhancing the accuracy of numerical simulations.

Implementation Method 1

a laser vibration scanner with a demodulation technique

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser Doppler Vibrometry: Laser Doppler Velocimetry

Data Source

PatentUS20250390635A1Method for Adapting Numerical Simulations of Mechanical Structures using Vibration Measurements
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 KLIPPEL WOLFGANG
  • US20250390635A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390635A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390635A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for verifying the vibration simulation of a mechanical structure and optimizing the elasticity and damping parameters used in the model by analyzing a vibration waveform measured on the surface of an existing prototype of this mechanical structure without physical contact. The correlation between the simulated and measured vibration waveforms is evaluated using an elasticity and damping metric, with optimized elasticity and damping parameters determined in an iterative simulation process. These metrics capture distinct properties of the vibrational shape: the elasticity metric employs the local wave number on the surface of the structure, while the damping metric assesses the decline of the envelope of traveling waves moving away from the excitation point and returning. This method is beneficial for adapting the complex modulus of elasticity in the numerical simulation of mechanical structures made from different material components that radiate sound across a broad frequency range.