Simulation Model Validation Boundaries for Extended Product Designs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing simulation models lack the ability to reliably assess product designs that extend beyond their validation space, leading to uncertain predictions and potential safety or financial risks due to the lack of predictive confidence in unvalidated areas.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that uses a verified and validated simulation model to calculate a correlation or scaling factor based on specific design differences, enabling the assessment of product designs outside the validation space by comparing and correlating them with the simulation model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If simulation models are used to assess product designs outside their validation space, then productivity increases by reducing physical tests, but reliability deteriorates due to uncertain predictions and lack of predictive confidence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment efficiencyVSAvoidpredictive confidence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation by comparing the subsequent product's design configuration against the validation space boundaries before conducting full assessment. This preliminary check ensures that only designs within or appropriately correlated to the validation space undergo simulation assessment, maintaining reliability while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A correlation factor calculation serves as an intermediary mechanism between the simulation model and product designs outside the validation space. This intermediary step quantifies the relationship between unvalidated designs and validated reference designs, enabling reliable assessment extrapolation while maintaining scientific rigor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If physical tests are conducted for all product designs, then reliability improves through direct validation, but productivity decreases due to costly and time-consuming testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidtesting throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial physical validation by conducting physical tests only on representative samples within the validation space rather than all possible product designs. This partial action approach maintains reliability for the validated domain while dramatically improving productivity by avoiding redundant testing of designs that can be assessed through simulation and correlation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual copies through simulation models that replicate physical product behavior. These digital twins enable comprehensive assessment of product designs without requiring physical prototypes, maintaining validation accuracy through verified simulations while eliminating the need for extensive physical testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If simulation models are extended beyond their validation space, then adaptability increases to cover more design scenarios, but measurement precision deteriorates due to lack of validation data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign coverageVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the assessment parameters by introducing a correlation factor that quantifies the relationship between unvalidated designs and validated reference designs. This parameter transformation enables the simulation model to provide reliable predictions for designs outside the original validation space by anchoring predictions to validated reference points, thus maintaining measurement precision while expanding adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a new dimension to the assessment by incorporating correlation factor calculation as an intermediate step. This dimensional extension transforms the problem from direct simulation prediction to correlation-based prediction, enabling accurate assessment of designs outside the validation space by leveraging relationships in the extended parameter space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250328918A1Technologies for assessing boundaries of intended use domain based on validation space
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 UL LLC
  • US20250328918A1 patent drawing
  • US20250328918A1 patent drawing
  • US20250328918A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for using a simulation model to assess compliance of a product having a design that extends beyond a validation space of the simulation model are provided. According to certain aspects, systems and methods may verify and validate a simulation model associated with a product and with a given validation space. The systems and methods may assess compliance, with a standard, of a product that extends beyond the validation space by calculating a correlation factor based on characteristics product designs, and using the correlation factor with the verified and validated simulation model.