Simulator for Semiconductor Damage Distribution Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current simulation techniques for evaluating damage from ion injection in device manufacturing, such as etching and PVD, face challenges in accurately and efficiently calculating damage distribution due to high computational complexity and time requirements, particularly when dealing with light particles like hydrogen and complex patterns.

Innovation Solution

A simulator utilizing the Flux method to calculate the relationship between injected and released substances during a process, reducing computational burden by using a database of reaction parameters and considering solid angle effects for patterned surfaces, allowing for faster damage distribution prediction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If molecular dynamics simulation technique is used to predict crystal lattice disorder in target film, then measurement precision of damage distribution is improved, but calculation time increases enormously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage distribution prediction accuracyVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates damage distribution data for various incident ion conditions (energy, angle, film type) and stores them in a database before actual simulation runs. This preliminary action eliminates the need to perform computationally intensive molecular dynamics calculations during each simulation, reducing calculation time from weeks to minutes while maintaining prediction accuracy through database lookup based on Monte Carlo calculated parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the simulation process into two separate stages: (1) Monte Carlo method to calculate incident particle position and angle on the pattern surface, and (2) database lookup to retrieve pre-calculated damage distribution data. This segmentation allows each method to be optimized independently, combining the geometric accuracy of Monte Carlo with the speed of pre-computed data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If molecular dynamics simulation is applied to real pattern with light particles like hydrogen, then damage distribution of complex pattern is evaluated, but calculation time becomes excessively long due to long flying distance of incident ions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to complex patterns and light particlesVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores damage distribution data for various incident ion conditions including light particles like hydrogen in a database. This preliminary computation covers the wide range of conditions before actual simulation, so that during practical use, only fast database lookup and Monte Carlo calculation are needed, regardless of particle type or pattern complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a database as an intermediary between the Monte Carlo calculation and the damage prediction. The database stores pre-computed damage distribution data that acts as a mediator, translating the geometric parameters from Monte Carlo into damage predictions without requiring real-time molecular dynamics simulation, thus enabling fast evaluation for any particle type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If Monte Carlo method is used to calculate incident particle position and angle, then transportation route in real pattern is considered, but calculation time is still long when large number of particles are required for high accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincidence angle and collision position accuracyVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs Monte Carlo calculation only for the specific parameters needed (incident position and angle on the pattern surface) rather than tracking the complete transportation route of all particles through the entire film thickness. This partial action approach focuses computational effort only on the geometric parameters that affect damage distribution, eliminating unnecessary calculations while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The simulator significantly reduces calculation time and improves accuracy in predicting damage distribution across larger areas, enabling quicker optimization of processing conditions and mask pattern layouts.

Implementation Method 1

calculating, using the Flux method, a relationship between an amount of a first substance externally injected onto a given evaluation point on a workpiece during a given process and an amount of a second substance released from the given evaluation point on the workpiece as a result of the injection of the first substance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlux method:

Data Source

PatentUS9411914B2Simulator, processing system, damage evaluation method and damage evaluation program
Publication Date: 2016.08.09 SONY SEMICON SOLUTIONS CORP
  • US9411914B2 patent drawing
  • US9411914B2 patent drawing
  • US9411914B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a simulator including: an input section adapted to acquire processing conditions for a given process performed on a workpiece; and a damage calculation section adapted to acquire the damage of the workpiece, based on the processing conditions, by calculating, using a Flux method, the relationship between the amount of a first substance externally injected onto a given evaluation point on the workpiece during the given process and the amount of a second substance released from the given evaluation point on the workpiece as a result of the injection of the first substance.