Simultaneous Parameter-Driven and Deterministic Hardware Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for verifying hardware design functionality separate parameter-driven random test scenarios from deterministic test scenarios, leading to undetected bugs and lack of synchronization control, with manual testcases requiring updates for randomization parameter changes and maintaining multiple copies for different biases.

Innovation Solution

A system and method enabling simultaneous execution of parameter-driven random and deterministic commands in a simulation environment using a command managing device, a random command generator, and a manually-driven testcase port, allowing independent modification of randomization biases without interrupting deterministic command execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If parameter-driven random test scenarios are executed separately from deterministic test scenarios, then test execution simplicity is maintained, but test coverage completeness deteriorates because bugs resulting from interactions between specialized test scenarios and random traffic go undetected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest coverage completenessVSAvoidsimulation environment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges parameter-driven random test scenarios and deterministic test scenarios into a single unified simulation environment. The command managing device receives and processes both random commands from the random command generator and deterministic commands from the testcase port simultaneously, allowing interaction bugs to be detected while maintaining manageable complexity through structured command arbitration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The command managing device serves multiple functions: it arbitrates between random and deterministic commands, manages command queues, handles synchronization control, and coordinates with both the random command generator and testcase port. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems, improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual testcases include random stimulus with fixed randomization parameters, then test scenario functionality is achieved, but adaptability deteriorates because randomization parameters cannot be modified without updating testcase files and creating multiple copies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandomization parameter flexibilityVSAvoidtestcase management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the randomization parameter control from the testcase logic. The random command generator receives parameters from a parameter file rather than from within the testcase file itself. This separation allows randomization parameters to be modified independently of testcase logic, improving adaptability while reducing testcase management complexity by eliminating the need to create and maintain multiple testcase copies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The command managing device acts as an intermediary between the parameter file and the command execution system. It reads randomization parameters from the parameter file and applies them when generating or processing random commands, decoupling parameter management from testcase management and enabling flexible parameter changes without modifying testcase files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If deterministic testcases are executed without synchronization control in a random parameter-driven environment, then test execution simplicity is maintained, but functionality deteriorates because synchronization control often included in targeted testcases cannot be supported

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization control capabilityVSAvoidcommand management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The command managing device serves as an intermediary that implements synchronization control mechanisms. It receives synchronization commands from the testcase port, coordinates with the random command generator to pause or control random command generation during critical deterministic test sections, and manages command queues to ensure proper execution ordering. This intermediary approach enables synchronization control without requiring fundamental changes to the random parameter-driven execution model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7865854B2Simultaneous parameter-driven and deterministic simulation with or without synchronization
Publication Date: 2011.01.04 SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC
  • US7865854B2 patent drawing
  • US7865854B2 patent drawing
  • US7865854B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for allowing simultaneous parameter-driven and deterministic simulation during verification of a hardware design, comprising: enabling a plurality of random parameter-driven commands from a random command generator to execute in a simulation environment during verification of the hardware design through a command managing device; and enabling a plurality of deterministic commands from a manually-driven testcase port to execute in the simulation environment simultaneously with the plurality of random parameter-driven commands during verification of the hardware design through the command managing device, the plurality of deterministic commands and the plurality of random parameter-driven commands each verify the functionality of the hardware design.