Single-Atom Alloy Water Splitting Catalyst for Low-Overpotential OER

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high energy consumption and requirement for precious metals in oxygen evolution reactions (OER) in water splitting, along with the instability of single-atom catalysts, hinder the commercialization of water electrolysis.

Innovation Solution

A water splitting catalyst comprising a porous carbon layer with a bimetallic metal alloy core and a single-atom precious metal dispersed on its surface, stabilized by adsorbed oxygen, which facilitates the OER by reducing the kinetic energy barrier and stabilizing intermediates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If RuO2 or IrO2 anode is used for oxygen evolution reaction, then catalytic activity is improved, but cost increases due to precious metal requirement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidprecious metal usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst is segmented into a core-shell structure where a non-precious metal core (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Mn, or Zn) is coated with a thin layer of precious metal (Ru, Ir, Rh, Pd, Ag, Au, or Pt). This segmentation allows the precious metal to be distributed on the surface rather than used throughout the entire catalyst, significantly reducing the quantity of precious metal required while maintaining high catalytic activity for the oxygen evolution reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite catalyst structure combining non-precious metal and precious metal in a core-shell configuration. The non-precious metal core provides structural support and cost reduction, while the precious metal shell provides the necessary catalytic activity. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by integrating materials with complementary properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If single-atom catalyst is used to reduce precious metal, then cost is reduced, but stability deteriorates due to weak interaction with support

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecious metal usageVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the advantages of single-atom catalysts (low precious metal usage) with bulk catalysts (high stability) by creating a core-shell structure. The non-precious metal core provides stable structural support, while the precious metal atoms on the surface maintain low cost. This combining approach resolves the contradiction by integrating the stability of bulk materials with the cost-effectiveness of single-atom catalysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The non-precious metal core acts as an intermediary that supports the precious metal atoms on the surface. This intermediary structure provides mechanical stability and prevents the precious metal atoms from aggregating or detaching, while still allowing the precious metal to function as an effective catalyst. The intermediary core thus enables the use of minimal precious metal without sacrificing stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If water splitting reaction is carried out, then hydrogen and oxygen are produced, but energy consumption increases due to high overpotential

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen and oxygen productionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the catalytic parameters by using a core-shell structure with specific non-precious metal cores (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Mn, or Zn) and precious metal shells (Ru, Ir, Rh, Pd, Ag, Au, or Pt). This parameter change in the catalyst composition and structure optimizes the oxygen evolution reaction, reducing the overpotential and thereby decreasing the energy consumption required for water splitting while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The catalyst achieves a lower overpotential and improved stability, reducing the energy required for oxygen evolution and enhancing the water splitting reaction efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a single-atom precious metal dispersed on the bimetallic metal alloy core, in which oxygen is adsorbed on the surface of the bimetallic metal alloy core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

oxygen is adsorbed on the surface of the bimetallic metal alloy core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

a porous carbon layer, a bimetallic metal alloy core dispersed on the porous carbon layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical support: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS12559849B2Water splitting catalyst
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 RES & BUSINESS FOUND SUNGKYUNKWAN UNIV
  • US12559849B2 patent drawing
  • US12559849B2 patent drawing
  • US12559849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a water splitting catalyst including a porous carbon layer, a bimetallic metal alloy core dispersed on the porous carbon layer, and a single-atom precious metal dispersed on the bimetallic metal alloy core, in which oxygen is adsorbed on the surface of the bimetallic metal alloy core.