Single Bioreactor for Scalable Clean Meat Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cell and tissue culture systems for producing clean meat are cumbersome, expensive, and not scalable for industrial use, lacking flexibility in culture protocols and requiring complex setups with multiple bioreactors and pumps.

Innovation Solution

A closed, continuous, or semi-continuous culture system utilizing a single bioreactor for cell growth and expansion, followed by tissue formation in separate reactors with optional cell-media separation, allowing for scalable and flexible production of clean meat products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple bioreactors and peristaltic pumps are used for cell culture, then cell growth can be maintained, but device complexity and capital expenditure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell growth maintenanceVSAvoidnumber of bioreactors and pumps
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single bioreactor is designed to perform multiple functions sequentially: first as a cell growth reactor, then as a media supply vessel, and finally the system enables tissue formation in a separate reactor. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for multiple specialized bioreactors and complex pump systems, directly resolving the contradiction between maintaining cell growth reliability and reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the functions of cell growth and media supply into a single bioreactor system. After cell growth, the same bioreactor is converted to serve as the media supply vessel for the tissue formation reactor, combining what would traditionally require separate systems into one integrated unit, thereby reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If culture bags are suspended in bioreactors with complex pump systems, then cell culture can be performed, but ease of operation and scalability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell culture capabilityVSAvoidsetup simplicity and scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The single bioreactor is designed to be reconfigurable for different operational modes (cell growth, media supply) without requiring complex reconfiguration equipment. This simplifies operation and enables easy scaling from lab to industrial production, as the same basic reactor design can be scaled in size rather than complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments functions into two distinct phases: cell growth in the bioreactor, then tissue formation in a separate reactor. This clear segmentation simplifies operation by providing distinct, manageable steps rather than requiring continuous complex pump control, and facilitates scalability by allowing independent optimization of each stage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If physical cell transfer outside closed system is performed, then cells can be moved between reactors, but contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell transfer capabilityVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A cell retention device serves as an intermediary component that enables cell transfer from the bioreactor to the tissue formation reactor while maintaining the closed system. Cells are retained and transferred through this intermediary device without requiring opening the system, thus enabling cell transfer capability while preventing contamination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous closed operation throughout the cell transfer process. The cell retention device and connected tubing allow cells to move between reactors through a continuous closed pathway, eliminating the need to stop and open the system, thereby maintaining contamination prevention while enabling necessary cell transfer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of manufacture

If single bioreactor is used for multiple functions, then capital expenditure is reduced, but manufacturing precision and process control become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapital expenditureVSAvoidprocess control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The bioreactor system is designed to be dynamically reconfigurable, changing its function from cell growth to media supply based on process stage. This dynamic adaptability allows a single reactor to perform multiple functions with precision control, as parameters can be optimized for each specific function rather than requiring compromise designs for multiple simultaneous functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system operates in periodic cycles, alternating between cell growth phase and media supply phase. This periodic operation allows the single bioreactor to maintain high manufacturing precision for each function by dedicating specific time periods to each task, with full optimization for that function during its active period, rather than requiring simultaneous multi-function operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20230303956A1Process system for bioreactor-based clean meat production
Publication Date: 2023.09.28 MERCK PATENT GMBH
  • US20230303956A1 patent drawing
  • US20230303956A1 patent drawing
  • US20230303956A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is for a closed environment process for the growth and differentiation of cells and the culturing of cells to confluency for the production of tissue. The tissue may be a clean meat product.